ReviewVision research2017
Observations on the relationship between anisometropia, amblyopia and strabismus.
Review in Vision research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 81 citations in OpenAlex.
- NEIVATECH pilot study: immersive virtual reality training in older amblyopic children with non-compliance or non-response to patching.Scientific reports · 2024Trial
- Relationship between form-deprivation myopia and amblyopic deficit.Vision research · 2026Article
- Associations Between Carotenoid Status, Visual Outcomes and Cognitive Metrics in Children: A Scoping Review.Nutrients · 2026Article
- Anisometropia and Its Related Traits: Ocular, Systemic, and Genetic Characteristics-Results From the Gutenberg Health Study.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Gender-based analysis of visual and refractive characteristics in exotropia.BMC ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Development of a Novel Deep Learning-Based Gaze Estimation Method for Detecting Strabismus.Cureus · 2026Article
- Macular and optic disc vascular densities measured by optical coherence tomography angiography in pediatric patients with different amblyopia types.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Correlation between binocular vision function and visual fatigue in school-age children with myopic anisometropia.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Efficacy of botulinum toxin and surgery in managing acute acquired comitant esotropia.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2025Article
- The hidden impact of myopia severity on interocular suppression in myopia: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- A case of reverse amblyopia in a myopic anisometropic patient: an atypical presentation.Journal of surgical case reports · 2024Article
- Factors associated with progressive anisometropia after bilateral intraocular lens implantation in patients with pediatric cataract.Eye (London, England) · 2024Article
- Changes in anisometropia by age in children with hyperopia, myopia, and antimetropia.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Defects and asymmetries in the visual pathway of non-human primates with natural strabismus and amblyopia.Zoological research · 2023Article
- Assessment of the effects of induced anisometropia on binocularity with glasses-free 3D technique.International journal of ophthalmology · 2023Article
- Differences in the Visual Performances of Patients with Strabismus, Amblyopia, and Healthy Controls.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Biometry and corneal aberrations after cataract surgery in childhood.Clinical & experimental ophthalmology · 2022Article
- Altered Homotopic Connectivity in the Cerebellum Predicts Stereopsis Dysfunction in Patients With Comitant Exotropia.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2022Article
- Macular and Optic Disc Parameters in Children with Amblyopic and Nonamblyopic Eyes under Optical Coherence Tomography Fundus Images.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
We investigated the potential causal relationships between anisometropia, amblyopia and strabismus, specifically to determine whether either amblyopia or strabismus interfered with emmetropization. We analyzed data from non-human primates that were relevant to the co-existence of anisometropia, amblyopia and strabismus in children. We relied on interocular comparisons of spatial vision and refractive development in animals reared with 1) monocular form deprivation; 2) anisometropia optically imposed by either contact lenses or spectacle lenses; 3) organic amblyopia produced by laser ablation of the fovea; and 4) strabismus that was either optically imposed with prisms or produced by either surgical or pharmacological manipulation of the extraocular muscles. Hyperopic anisometropia imposed early in life produced amblyopia in a dose-dependent manner. However, when potential methodological confounds were taken into account, there was no support for the hypothesis that the presence of amblyopia interferes with emmetropization or promotes hyperopia or that the degree of image degradation determines the direction of eye growth. To the contrary, there was strong evidence that amblyopic eyes were able to detect the presence of a refractive error and alter ocular growth to eliminate the ametropia. On the other hand, early onset strabismus, both optically and surgically imposed, disrupted the emmetropization process producing anisometropia. In surgical strabismus, the deviating eyes were typically more hyperopic than their fellow fixating eyes. The results show that early hyperopic anisometropia is a significant risk factor for amblyopia. Early esotropia can trigger the onset of both anisometropia and amblyopia. However, amblyopia, in isolation, does not pose a significant risk for the development of hyperopia or anisometropia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.