Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28404230›Full record

ArticleDisability and health journal2017

Birth outcomes among US women with intellectual and developmental disabilities.

Ilhom Akobirshoev, Susan L Parish, Monika Mitra, Eliana Rosenthal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Disability and health journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ilhom AkobirshoevLurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA. Electronic address: ilhom@brandeis.edu.
Susan L ParishLurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Monika MitraLurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Eliana RosenthalLurie Institute for Disability Policy, Brandeis University, Waltham, MA, USA.
Brandeis University · US

Funding

Pregnancy experiences of women with IDD: Family caregiver perspectivesR01HD082105 · NICHD · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI MITRA, MONIKA, PARISH, SUSAN L. · 2015 to 2019
$2.8M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD082105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWomen with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD) are bearing children at increasing rates. However, there is very little research about pregnancy experiences and birth outcomes among women with IDD. No studies to date have examined birth outcomes with a US population-based sample.

objectiveThe main objective was to estimate the national occurrence of deliveries in women with IDD and to compare their birth outcomes to women without IDD.

methodsWe examined the 2007-2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project to compare birth outcomes in women with and without IDD. Birth outcomes included preterm birth, low birth weight, and stillbirth. Multivariable regression analyses compared birth outcomes between women with and without IDD controlling for race/ethnicity, maternal age, household income, health insurance status and type, comorbidity, region and hospital location, teaching status, ownership, and year.

resultsOf an estimated 20.6 million deliveries identified through the HCUP 2007-2011 data 10,275 occurred in women with IDD. In adjusted regression analyses, women with IDD compared to those without IDD were significantly more likely to have preterm birth (OR = 1.46; 95%CI: 1.26-1.69, p < 0.001), low birth weight (OR = 1.61, 95%CI: 1.27-2.05, p < 0.001), and stillbirth (OR = 2.40, 95% CI: 1.70-3.40, p < 0.001).

conclusionThis study provides a first examination of the birth outcomes among women with IDD in the United States using a largest population-based sample. There are significant differences in birth outcomes between women with and without IDD. Understanding the causes of these differences and addressing these causes are critical to improving pregnancy outcomes among women with IDD.

Indexed as

Infant, Low Birth WeightAdultDevelopmental DisabilitiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornIntellectual DisabilityPersons with DisabilitiesPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthUnited StatesYoung AdultBirth outcomesLow birth weightPregnancyPreterm birthStillbirthWomen intellectual and developmental disabilities

Identifiers

PMID28404230
PMCPMC5477666
OpenAlexW2605215864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.