ArticleThe lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology2017
A non-endoscopic device to sample the oesophageal microbiota: a case-control study.
Article in The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 104 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
104 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 162 citations in OpenAlex.
- Esophageal microbiota composition and outcome of esophageal cancer treatment: a systematic review.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2022Pooled it
- A machine-learning informed circulating microbial DNA signature for early diagnosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma.Gut microbes · 2026Article
- Screening for Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma: recent advances and next steps.Diseases of the esophagus : official journal of the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus · 2026Review
- Cariogenic microorganisms induce oral epithelial atypia through host-microbiome-high sugar diet interactions.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- Preliminary insights into gut microbiome shifts as screening proxy for MASLD disease progression.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Community assembly modeling of the microbiome within Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma.BMC genomics · 2026Article
- Plant-based diet quality is associated with esophageal mucosa-associated microbiome profiles and disease severity in a high-risk Chinese population.Journal of oral microbiology · 2026Article
- Nonendoscopic Screening for Barrett's Esophagus: Current Methods, Evidence, and Future Directions.Gastro hep advances · 2026Review
- Intestinal and esophageal microbiota in esophageal cancer development and treatment.Gut microbes · 2025Review
- Increased reflux secondary bile acids are associated with changes to the microbiome and transcriptome in Barrett's esophagus.Gut microbes · 2025Article
- Review
- Advancements in understanding tumor-resident bacteria and their application in cancer therapy.Military Medical Research · 2025Review
- Esophageal microbiome correlates with post-esophagectomy anastomotic leak in cancer patients.ESMO gastrointestinal oncology · 2025Article
- New Approaches to Screening for Barrett Esophagus.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025Article
- Review
- Intratumoral microbiota: a new force in the development and treatment of esophageal cancer.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2025Review
- Sampling strategies for digestive system flora studies: current research and perspectives.PeerJ · 2025Review
- The Involvement of Oral Pathogenic Bacteria,Gastro hep advances · 2025Article
- Gut dysbiosis in cancer immunotherapy: microbiota-mediated resistance and emerging treatments.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Tissue source may affect the esophageal flora in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.Oncology letters · 2025Article
44 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe strongest risk factor for oesophageal adenocarcinoma is reflux disease, and the rising incidence of this coincides with the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, both of which might alter the oesophageal microbiota. We aimed to profile the microbiota at different stages of Barrett's carcinogenesis and investigate the Cytosponge as a minimally invasive tool for sampling the oesophageal microbiota.
methodsIn this case-control study, 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing was done on 210 oesophageal samples from 86 patients representing the Barrett's oesophagus progression sequence (normal squamous controls [n=20], non-dysplastic [n=24] and dysplastic Barrett's oesophagus [n=23], and oesophageal adenocarcinoma [n=19]), relevant negative controls, and replicates on the Illumina MiSeq platform. Samples were taken from patients enrolled in the BEST2 study at five UK hospitals and the OCCAMS study at six UK hospitals. We compared fresh frozen tissue, fresh frozen endoscopic brushings, and the Cytosponge device for microbial DNA yield (qPCR), diversity, and community composition.
findingsThere was decreased microbial diversity in oesophageal adenocarcinoma tissue compared with tissue from healthy control patients as measured by the observed operational taxonomic unit (OTU) richness (p=0·0012), Chao estimated total richness (p=0·0004), and Shannon diversity index (p=0·0075). Lactobacillus fermentum was enriched in oesophageal adenocarcinoma (p=0·028), and lactic acid bacteria dominated the microenvironment in seven (47%) of 15 cases of oesophageal adenocarcinoma. Comparison of oesophageal sampling methods showed that the Cytosponge yielded more than ten-times higher quantities of microbial DNA than did endoscopic brushes or biopsies using quantitative PCR (p<0·0001). The Cytosponge samples contained the majority of taxa detected in biopsy and brush samples, but were enriched for genera from the oral cavity and stomach, including Fusobacterium, Megasphaera, Campylobacter, Capnocytophaga, and Dialister. The Cytosponge detected decreased microbial diversity in patients with high-grade dysplasia in comparison to control patients, as measured by the observed OTU richness (p=0·0147), Chao estimated total richness (p=0·023), and Shannon diversity index (p=0·0085).
interpretationAlterations in microbial communities occur in the lower oesophagus in Barrett's carcinogenesis, which can be detected at the pre-invasive stage of high-grade dysplasia with the novel Cytosponge device. Our findings are potentially applicable to early disease detection, and future test development should focus on longitudinal sampling of the microbiota to monitor for changes in microbial diversity in a larger cohort of patients.
fundingCancer Research UK, National Institute for Health Research, Medical Research Council, Wellcome Trust, The Scottish Government (RESAS).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.