Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403896›Full record

ReviewMicrobial cell factories2017

Gas fermentation: cellular engineering possibilities and scale up.

Björn D Heijstra, Ching Leang, Alex Juminaga

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Microbial cell factories, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Application of functional genomics for domestication of novel non-model microbes.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2024
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Enzymatic Conversion of COChemical reviews · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. P3HB from CHFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Translating advances in microbial bioproduction to sustainable biotechnology.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2022
    Review
  12. Process Engineering Aspects for the Microbial Conversion of C1 Gases.Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Overcoming Energetic Barriers in Acetogenic C1 Conversion.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Acetogenic Fermentation From Oxygen Containing Waste Gas.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2019
    Article
  18. Using gas mixtures of CO, COMicrobial biotechnology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Björn D HeijstraLanzaTech, Inc., 8045 Lamon Ave, Suite 400, Skokie, IL, USA. bjorn.heijstra@lanzatech.com.
Ching LeangLanzaTech, Inc., 8045 Lamon Ave, Suite 400, Skokie, IL, USA.
Alex JuminagaLanzaTech, Inc., 8045 Lamon Ave, Suite 400, Skokie, IL, USA.
AZ Technology (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low carbon fuels and chemicals can be sourced from renewable materials such as biomass or from industrial and municipal waste streams. Gasification of these materials allows all of the carbon to become available for product generation, a clear advantage over partial biomass conversion into fermentable sugars. Gasification results into a synthesis stream (syngas) containing carbon monoxide (CO), carbon dioxide (CO

Indexed as

Cell EngineeringFermentationBacteria, AnaerobicCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideHumansHydrogenNitrogenCarbon DioxideCarbon MonoxideHydrogenNitrogenCarbon capture and utilizationCarbon recyclingClimate changeFermentationGas contaminantsGHGScale upSyngasWaste gas

Identifiers

PMID28403896
PMCPMC5389167
OpenAlexW2607511664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.