ArticleRespiratory research2017
Determining the presence of asthma-related molecules and salivary contamination in exhaled breath condensate.
Article in Respiratory research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Molecular profiling of exhaled breath condensate in respiratory diseases.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Association of Childhood Asthma with the Concept of Exposomics: A Short Review.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025Review
- Applied body-fluid analysis by wearable devices.Nature · 2024Review
- A smart mask for exhaled breath condensate harvesting and analysis.Science (New York, N.Y.) · 2024Article
- Metabolomics in pulmonary medicine: extracting the most from your data.The European respiratory journal · 2022Article
- Metabolomics in asthma: A platform for discovery.Molecular aspects of medicine · 2022Review
- Challenges in Quantifying 8-OHdG and 8-Isoprostane in Exhaled Breath Condensate.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- The Role of Probiotics in Skin Photoaging and Related Mechanisms: A Review.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2022Review
- Mass Spectrometry-Based Human Breath Analysis: Towards COVID-19 Diagnosis and Research.Journal of analysis and testing · 2021Review
- New Insights Into the Skin Microbial Communities and Skin Aging.Frontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Article
- Development and validation of exhaled breath condensate microRNAs to identify and endotype asthma in children.PloS one · 2019Article
- Stability control for breath analysis using GC-MS.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2018Article
- Determination of thiocyanate in exhaled breath condensate.Free radical biology & medicine · 2018Article
- Effect of temperature control on the metabolite content in exhaled breath condensate.Analytica chimica acta · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundResearchers investigating lung diseases, such as asthma, have questioned whether certain compounds previously reported in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) originate from saliva contamination. Moreover, despite its increasing use in 'omics profiling studies, the constituents of EBC remain largely uncharacterized. The present study aims to define the usefulness of EBC in investigating lung disease by comparing EBC, saliva, and saliva-contaminated EBC using targeted and untargeted mass spectrometry and the potential of metabolite loss from adsorption to EBC sample collection tubes.
methodsLiquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) was used to analyze samples from 133 individuals from three different cohorts. Levels of amino acids and eicosanoids, two classes of molecules previously reported in EBC and saliva, were measured using targeted LC-MS. Cohort 1 was used to examine contamination of EBC by saliva. Samples from Cohort 1 consisted of clean EBC, saliva-contaminated EBC, and clean saliva from 13 healthy volunteers; samples were analyzed using untargeted LC-MS. Cohort 2 was used to compare eicosanoid levels from matched EBC and saliva collected from 107 asthmatic subjects. Samples were analyzed using both targeted and untargeted LC-MS. Cohort 3 samples consisted of clean-EBC collected from 13 subjects, including smokers and non-smokers, and were used to independently confirm findings; samples were analyzed using targeted LC-MS, untargeted LC-MS, and proteomics. In addition to human samples, an in-house developed nebulizing system was used to determine the potential for EBC samples to be contaminated by saliva.
resultsOut of the 400 metabolites detected in both EBC and saliva, 77 were specific to EBC; however, EBC samples were concentrated 20-fold to achieve this level of sensitivity. Amino acid concentrations ranged from 196 pg/mL - 4 μg/mL (clean EBC), 1.98 ng/mL - 6 μg/mL (saliva-contaminated EBC), and 13.84 ng/mL - 1256 mg/mL (saliva). Eicosanoid concentration ranges were an order of magnitude lower; 10 pg/mL - 76.5 ng/mL (clean EBC), 10 pg/mL - 898 ng/mL (saliva-contaminated EBC), and 2.54 ng/mL - 272.9 mg/mL (saliva). Although the sample size of the replication cohort (Cohort 3) did not allow for statistical comparisons, two proteins and 19 eicosanoids were detected in smoker vs. non-smoker clean-EBC.
conclusionsWe conclude that metabolites are present and detectable in EBC using LC-MS; however, a large starting volume of sample is required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.