Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403824›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2017

Using a quality improvement model to enhance providers' performance in maternal and newborn health care: a post-only intervention and comparison design.

Firew Ayalew, Gizachew Eyassu, Negash Seyoum, Jos van Roosmalen, Eva Bazant, Young Mi Kim, Alemnesh Tekleberhan, Hannah Gibson, Ephrem Daniel, Jelle Stekelenburg

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Status of institutional-level respectful maternity care: Results from the national Ethiopia EmONC assessment.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Firew AyalewJhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. Firew.Ayalew@Jhpiego.org.
Gizachew EyassuJhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Negash SeyoumJhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jos van RoosmalenAthena Institute, VU University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Eva BazantJhpiego, 1615 Thames St # 200, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Young Mi KimJhpiego, 1615 Thames St # 200, Baltimore, MD, 21231, USA.
Alemnesh TekleberhanJhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Hannah GibsonJhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Ephrem DanielJhpiego Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Jelle StekelenburgDepartment of Health Sciences, Global Health, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLMedisch Centrum Leeuwarden · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Standards Based Management and Recognition (SBM-R

methodsA post-only evaluation design was conducted at three hospitals and eight health centers implementing SBM-R and the same number of comparison health facilities. Structured checklists were used to observe MNH providers' performance on ANC (236 provider-client interactions), uncomplicated labor and delivery (226 provider-client interactions), and immediate PNC services in the six hours after delivery (232 provider-client interactions); observations were divided equally between intervention and comparison groups. Main outcomes were provider performance scores, calculated as the percentage of essential tasks in each service area completed by providers. Multilevel analysis was used to calculate adjusted mean percentage performance scores and standard errors to compare intervention and comparison groups.

resultsThere was no statistically significant difference between intervention and comparison facilities in overall mean performance scores for ANC services (63.4% at intervention facilities versus 61.0% at comparison facilities, p = 0.650) or in any specific ANC skill area. MNH providers' overall mean performance score for uncomplicated labor and delivery care was 11.9 percentage points higher in the intervention than in the comparison group (77.5% versus 65.6%; p = 0.002). Overall mean performance scores for immediate PNC were 22.2 percentage points higher at intervention than at comparison facilities (72.8% versus 50.6%; p = 0.001); and there was a significant difference of 22 percentage points between intervention and comparison facilities for each PNC skill area: care for the newborn and health check for the mother.

conclusionsThe SBM-R quality improvement intervention made a significant positive impact on MNH providers' performance during labor and delivery and immediate PNC services, but not during ANC services. Scaling up the intervention to other facilities and regions may increase the availability of good quality MNH services across Ethiopia. The findings will also guide implementation of the government's five-year (2015-2020) health sector transformation plan and health care quality strategies needed to meet the country's MNH goals.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalEthiopiaFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMaleMaternal HealthMaternal Health ServicesOutcome Assessment, Health CarePostnatal CareQuality Assurance, Health CareQuality ImprovementAntenatal careEthiopiaLabor and deliveryMaternal healthNewborn healthPostnatal careProvider performanceQuality improvementSBM-R

Identifiers

PMID28403824
PMCPMC5389001
OpenAlexW2607094977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.