Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403822›Full record

ArticleBMC family practice2017

Provider and patient perspectives on opioids and alternative treatments for managing chronic pain: a qualitative study.

Lauren S Penney, Cheryl Ritenbaugh, Lynn L DeBar, Charles Elder, Richard A Deyo

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC family practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01345409 (Acupuncture and Chiropractic Care for Chronic Pain in an Integrated Health Plan), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01345409 completednot on this map

Acupuncture and Chiropractic Care for Chronic Pain in an Integrated Health Plan

TypeobservationalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2010 to 2016Enrolled1,242ConditionsChronic Pain
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 98 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Development and validation of the Pain-Induced Comfort Eating Scale in a chronic pain sample.Canadian journal of pain = Revue canadienne de la douleur · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren S PenneySouth Texas Veterans Health Care System, 7400 Merton Minter Blvd, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
Cheryl RitenbaughThe University of Arizona, Department of Family and Community Medicine, 1450N. Cherry Ave, Tucson, AZ, 85719, USA.
Lynn L DeBarKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Northwest Region, 3800N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA. Lynn.DeBar@kpchr.org.
Charles ElderKaiser Permanente Center for Health Research Northwest Region, 3800N. Interstate Ave, Portland, OR, 97227, USA.
Richard A DeyoOregon Health & Science University, 3181S.W. Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research · USOregon Health & Science University · USSouth Texas Veterans Health Care System · USUniversity of Arizona · US

Funding

Use of Acupuncture for Chronic Pain within an Integrated Health PlanR01AT005896 · NCCIH · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI DEBAR, LYNN L. · 2010 to 2014
$3.5M
NCCIH NIH HHS R01 AT005896
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCurrent literature describes the limits and pitfalls of using opioid pharmacotherapy for chronic pain and the importance of identifying alternatives. The objective of this study was to identify the practical issues patients and providers face when accessing alternatives to opioids, and how multiple parties view these issues.

methodsQualitative data were gathered to evaluate the outcomes of acupuncture and chiropractic (A/C) services for chronic musculoskeletal pain (CMP) using structured interview guides among patients with CMP (n = 90) and primary care providers (PCPs) (n = 25) purposively sampled from a managed care health care system as well as from contracted community A/C providers (n = 14). Focus groups and interviews were conducted patients with CMP with varying histories of A/C use. Plan PCPs and contracted A/C providers took part in individual interviews. All participants were asked about their experiences managing chronic pain and experience with and/or attitudes about A/C treatment. Audio recordings were transcribed and thematically coded. A summarized version of the focus group/interview guides is included in the Additional file 1.

resultsWe identified four themes around opioid use: (1) attitudes toward use of opioids to manage chronic pain; (2) the limited alternative options for chronic pain management; (3) the potential of A/C care as a tool to help manage pain; and (4) the complex system around chronic pain management. Despite widespread dissatisfaction with opioid medications for pain management, many practical barriers challenged access to other options. Most of the participants' perceived A/C care as helpful for short term pain relief. We identified that problems with timing, expectations, and plan coverage limited A/C care potential for pain relief treatment.

conclusionsThese results suggest that education about realistic expectations for chronic pain management and therapy options, as well as making A/C care more easily accessible, might lead to more satisfaction for patients and providers, and provide important input to policy makers.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT01345409 , date of registration 28/4/2011.

Indexed as

Physician-Patient RelationsAcupuncture TherapyAdultAgedAnalgesics, OpioidCombined Modality TherapyFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleManipulation, ChiropracticMiddle AgedMusculoskeletal PainPhysicians, Primary CareQualitative ResearchQuality of LifeAnalgesics, OpioidAcupunctureChiropracticChronic painComplementary medicineOpioidsPrimary care

Identifiers

PMID28403822
PMCPMC5390355
OpenAlexW2552093157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.