Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403664›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses2017

Milk Options Observation (MOO): A Mixed-Methods Study of Chocolate Milk Removal on Beverage Consumption and Student/Staff Behaviors in a Rural Elementary School.

Melinda M Davis, Margaret Spurlock, Katrina Ramsey, Jamie Smith, Beth Ann Beamer, Susan Aromaa, Paul B McGinnis

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of school nursing : the official publication of the National Association of School Nurses, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Melinda M Davis1 Department of Family Medicine, OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Rural Practice-Based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Margaret Spurlock2 School-Based Health Center, Multnomah County, Portland, OR, USA.
Katrina Ramsey3 OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Jamie Smith4 Adolescent and School Health Program, Oregon Public Health Division, Portland, OR, USA.
Beth Ann Beamer5 Warm Springs Extension, Warm Springs, OR, USA.
Susan Aromaa6 Center for Evidence-Based Policy, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
Paul B McGinnis7 Greater Oregon Behavioral Health Inc., The Dalles, OR, USA.
Oregon Health & Science University · USMultnomah County Health Department · USOregon Health Authority · USResearch Network (United States) · US

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research InstituteUL1TR000128 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI ELLISON, DAVID H · 2012 to 2015
$28.7M
Oregon Patient Centered Outcomes Research K12 ProgramK12HS022981 · AHRQ · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI GUISE, JEANNE-MARIE · 2014 to 2018
$4.1M
AHRQ HHS K12 HS022981NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000128
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Providing flavored milk in school lunches is controversial, with conflicting evidence on its impact on nutritional intake versus added sugar consumption and excess weight gain. Nonindustry-sponsored studies using individual-level analyses are needed. Therefore, we conducted this mixed-methods study of flavored milk removal at a rural primary school between May and June 2012. We measured beverage selection/consumption pre- and post-chocolate milk removal and collected observation field notes. We used linear and logistic mixed models to assess beverage waste and identified themes in staff and student reactions. Our analysis of data from 315 unique students and 1,820 beverages choices indicated that average added sugar intake decreased by 2.8 g postremoval, while average reductions in calcium and protein consumption were negligible (12.2 mg and 0.3 g, respectively). Five thematic findings emerged, including concerns expressed by adult staff about student rebellion following removal, which did not come to fruition. Removing flavored milk from school-provided lunches may lower students' daily added sugar consumption without considerably decreasing calcium and protein intake and may promote healthy weight.

Indexed as

CacaoFeeding BehaviorMilkAdolescentAnimalsBeveragesChildDietary SucroseFemaleFood ServicesHumansMaleRural PopulationStudentsDietary Sucroseelementary schoolflavored milkparticipatory researchruralschool lunchschool nursing

Identifiers

PMID28403664
PMCPMC7314575
OpenAlexW2605862948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.