ArticleJAMA surgery2017
Risk Stratification for Surgical Site Infections in Colon Cancer.
Article in JAMA surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04550156 (Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections), which is not on this map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mortality risk in patients with underweight or obesity with peripheral artery disease: a meta-analysis including 5,735,578 individuals.International journal of obesity (2005) · 2022Pooled it
- Surgical site infection prevention and management in immunocompromised patients: a systematic review of the literature.World journal of emergency surgery : WJES · 2021Pooled it
- The influence of diabetes on postoperative complications following colorectal surgery.Techniques in coloproctology · 2021Pooled it
- Optimal preoperative bowel preparation for intracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic colectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- High versus low ligation of the inferior mesenteric artery during transanal total mesorectal excision for low rectal cancer: impact on postoperative anastomotic leakage.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- Effectiveness of the presence of diabetologists for perioperative complications in patients with diabetes undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A nationwide inpatient database in Japan.Journal of diabetes investigation · 2025Article
- Impact of Prophylactic Intraoperative Redosing of Antibiotics on the Incidence of Surgical Site Infection in Elective Colorectal Surgery: Results of a Propensity Score-based Analysis.Journal of the anus, rectum and colon · 2025Article
- Nutritional status of patients with gastrointestinal cancers and analysis of factors for postoperative infections.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Surgical Site Infections in Colorectal Cancer Surgeries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Impact of Surgical Approach and Associated Risk Factors.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Meta-analysis of postoperative incision infection risk factors in colorectal cancer surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Risk Factors Associated with Postoperative Outcomes in Diverticular Disease Undergoing Elective Colectomy-A Retrospective Cohort Study from the ACS-NSQIP Database.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Impact of visceral obesity on infectious complications after resection for colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.Lipids in health and disease · 2023Article
- Risk factors for postoperative complications after pheochromocytoma and/or paraganglioma: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in oncology · 2023Article
- Evaluation of the Introduction of a Colorectal Bundle in Left Sided Colorectal Resections (EvaCol): Study Protocol of a Multicentre, Observational Trial.International journal of surgery protocols · 2022Article
- Prospective multicenter study on the incidence of surgical site infection after emergency abdominal surgery in China.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Expert commentary on the challenges and opportunities for surgical site infection prevention through implementation of evidence-based guidelines in the Asia-Pacific Region.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2021Article
- Assessment of the Risk and Economic Burden of Surgical Site Infection Following Colorectal Surgery Using a US Longitudinal Database: Is There a Role for Innovative Antimicrobial Wound Closure Technology to Reduce the Risk of Infection?Diseases of the colon and rectum · 2020Observational
- Oncological outcome of surgical site infection after colorectal cancer surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2019Article
- Prophylactic closed-incision negative-pressure wound therapy is associated with decreased surgical site infection in high-risk colorectal surgery laparotomy wounds.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2019Article
- Examination of Risk Factors for the Development of Surgical Site Infections.Materia socio-medica · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Surgical site infections (SSIs) feature prominently in surgical quality improvement and pay-for-performance measures. Multiple approaches are used to prevent or reduce SSIs, prompted by the heavy toll they take on patients and health care budgets. Surgery for colon cancer is not an exception. Objective: To identify a risk stratification score based on baseline and operative characteristics. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included all patients treated surgically for colon cancer at Massachusetts General Hospital from 2004 through 2014 (n = 1481). Main Outcomes and Measures: The incidence of SSI stratified over baseline and perioperative factors was compared and compounded in a risk score. Results: Among the 1481 participants, 90 (6.1%) had SSI. Median (IQR) age was 66.9 (55.9-78.1) years. Surgical site infection rates were significantly higher among people who smoked (7.4% vs 4.8%; P = .04), people who abused alcohol (10.6% vs 5.7%; P = .04), people with type 2 diabetics (8.8% vs 5.5%; P = .046), and obese patients (11.7% vs 4.0%; P < .001). Surgical site infection rates were also higher among patients with an operation duration longer than 140 minutes (7.5% vs 5.0%; P = .05) and in nonlaparoscopic approaches (clinically significant only, 6.7% vs 4.1%; P = .07). These risk factors were also associated with an increase in SSI rates as a compounded score (P < .001). Patients with 1 or fewer risk factors (n = 427) had an SSI rate of 2.3%, equivalent to a relative risk of 0.4 (95% CI, 0.16-0.57; P < .001); patients with 2 risk factors (n = 445) had a 5.2% SSI rate (relative risk, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.49-1.22; P = .27); patients with 3 factors (n = 384) had a 7.8% SSI rate (relative risk, 1.38; 95% CI, 0.91-2.11; P = .13); and patients with 4 or more risk factors (n = 198) had a 13.6% SSI rate (relative risk, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.77-4.12; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This SSI risk assessment factor provides a simple tool using readily available characteristics to stratify patients by SSI risk and identify patients at risk during their postoperative admission. Thereby, it can be used to potentially focus frequent monitoring and more aggressive preventive efforts on high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.