Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403472›Full record

Trial reportNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2017

Smoking Cessation for Pregnant Smokers: Development and Pilot Test of an Emotion Regulation Treatment Supplement to Standard Smoking Cessation for Negative Affect Smokers.

Clara M Bradizza, Paul R Stasiewicz, Yue Zhuo, Melanie Ruszczyk, Stephen A Maisto, Joseph F Lucke, Thomas H Brandon, Rina D Eiden, Kim S Slosman, Paulette Giarratano

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Contingency Management Versus Psychotherapy for Prenatal Smoking Cessation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Women's health issues : official publication of the Jacobs Institute of Women's Health
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Clara M BradizzaResearch Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Paul R StasiewiczResearch Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Yue ZhuoResearch Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Melanie RuszczykResearch Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Stephen A MaistoDepartment of Psychology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY.
Joseph F LuckeResearch Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Thomas H BrandonDepartment of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL.
Rina D EidenResearch Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Kim S SlosmanResearch Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
Paulette GiarratanoResearch Institute on Addictions, University at Buffalo-State University of New York, Buffalo, NY.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USMoffitt Cancer Center · USSyracuse University · US

Funding

Affect Regulation Training for Pregnant SmokersR01DA021802 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI BRADIZZA, CLARA MARGARET · 2007 to 2010
$1.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA021802
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionNegative affect has been identified as a factor influencing continued smoking during pregnancy. In this study, a multi-component emotion regulation intervention was developed to address negative emotional smoking triggers and pilot-tested among low-income pregnant smokers. Treatment feasibility and acceptability, cotinine-verified rates of smoking cessation, and self-report of mean cigarettes smoked were assessed.

methodsPregnant smokers who self-reported smoking in response to negative affect (N = 70) were randomly assigned to receive one of two 8-session interventions: (1) emotion regulation treatment combined with standard cognitive-behavioral smoking cessation (ERT + CBT) or (2) a health and lifestyle plus standard smoking cessation active control (HLS + CBT). Outcomes for the 4-month period following the quit date are reported.

resultsTreatment attendance and subjective ratings provide evidence for the feasibility and acceptability of the ERT + CBT intervention. Compared with the HLS + CBT control condition, the ERT + CBT condition demonstrated higher abstinence rates at 2 months (ERT + CBT = 23% vs. HLS + CBT = 0%, OR = 13.51; 95% CI = 0.70-261.59) and 4 months (ERT = 18% vs. HLS = 5%; OR = 2.98; 95% CI = 0.39-22.72) post-quit. Mean number of cigarettes per day was significantly lower in ERT + CBT at 2 months (ERT + CBT = 2.73 (3.35) vs. HLS + CBT = 5.84 (6.24); p = .05) but not at 4 months (ERT + CBT = 2.15 (3.17) vs. HLS + CBT = 5.18 (2.88); p = .06) post-quit.

conclusionsThe development and initial test of the ERT + CBT intervention supports its feasibility and acceptability in this difficult-to-treat population. Further development and testing in a Stage II randomized clinical trial are warranted. IMPLICATIONS: Negative affect has been identified as a motivator for continued smoking during pregnancy. To date, smoking cessation interventions for pregnant smokers have not specifically addressed the role of negative affect as a smoking trigger. This treatment development pilot study provides support for the feasibility and acceptability of a multi-component ERT + CBT for low-income pregnant smokers who self-report smoking in response to negative affect. Study findings support further testing in a fully-powered Stage II efficacy trial powered to assess mediators and moderators of treatment effects.

Indexed as

AffectMotivationAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyCotinineEmotionsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansPatient Acceptance of Health CarePilot ProjectsPovertyPregnancyPregnant PeopleSelf-ControlSmokingCotinine

Identifiers

PMID28403472
PMCPMC5939632
OpenAlexW2606570467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.