Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403219›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2017

Incidental hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation: Prevalence, histopathological features and prognostic impact.

Pablo Pérez, Manuel Rodríguez-Perálvarez, Lourdes Guerrero, Víctor González, Rafael Sánchez, Macarena Centeno, Antonio Poyato, Javier Briceño, Marina Sánchez-Frías, Jose Luis Montero and 1 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic impact of incidentally detected hepatocellular carcinoma in explanted livers after living donor liver transplantation.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Pablo PérezDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4182-0254
Manuel Rodríguez-PerálvarezDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1795-2919
Lourdes GuerreroDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Víctor GonzálezDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Rafael SánchezDepartment of Pathology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Macarena CentenoDepartment of Pathology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Antonio PoyatoDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Javier BriceñoDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Marina Sánchez-FríasDepartment of Pathology, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Jose Luis MonteroDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Manuel De la MataDepartment of Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidental hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) is a histological finding after liver transplantation (LT) which relevance has been scarcely studied.

aimsto describe the histopathological features of iHCC and to determine its prognostic impact in terms of tumor recurrence and overall survival.

methodsObservational study including 451 consecutive adult LT patients (2000-2013). Patients aged<18, retransplanted or with early postoperative death were excluded. Median follow-up after LT was 58 months. Multiple Cox's regression was used to assess the prognostic impact of iHCC on tumor recurrence and mortality while controlling for potential confounders.

results141 patients had known HCC before LT (31.3%). Among the remaining 310 patients, the prevalence of iHCC was 8.7% (n = 27). In the explanted liver, 36.2% of patients with known HCC and 25.9% of patients with iHCC trespassed Milan criteria (p = 0.30). Patients with known and iHCC had similar rates of multinodular disease (50.4% vs 55.6%; p = 0.62), macrovascular invasion (6.5% vs 3.7%; p = 0.58), microvascular invasion (12.9% vs 14.8%; p = 0.76) and moderate-poor tumor differentiation (53.9% vs 70.4%; p = 0.09). In the multivariate analysis, iHCC and known HCC had identical recurrence-free survival after controlling for histological features (RR = 1.06, 95%CI 0.36-3.14; p = 0.90). Cumulative 5-year overall survival rates were similar between patients with known and iHCC (65% vs 52.8% respectively; log rank p = 0.44), but significantly inferior as compared with patients without HCC (77.8%) (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007 respectively). Indeed, in the overall cohort, iHCC was an independent predictor of mortality (RR = 3.02; 95%CI 1.62-5.65; p = 0.001).

conclusionThe risk of tumor recurrence after LT is similar in patients with iHCC and known HCC. A close imaging surveillance is strongly recommended for patients awaiting LT in order to detect HCC prior to LT, thus allowing for an adequate selection of candidates, prioritization and indication of bridging therapies.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, HepatocellularDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiverLiver NeoplasmsLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisPrevalencePrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID28403219
PMCPMC5389640

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.