Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403214›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Antibody-independent capture of circulating tumor cells of non-epithelial origin with the ApoStream® system.

Priya Balasubramanian, Robert J Kinders, Shivaani Kummar, Vishal Gupta, David Hasegawa, Anoop Menachery, Scott M Lawrence, Lihua Wang, Katherine Ferry-Galow, Darren Davis and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Circulating Tumor Cells: Emerging Frontiers in Cancer Technology.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Recent Advances in Methods for Circulating Tumor Cell Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Priya BalasubramanianLaboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/ Developmental Research Support Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Robert J KindersLaboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/ Developmental Research Support Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5310-3367
Shivaani KummarDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Vishal GuptaApoCell, Inc., Houston, Texas, United States of America.
David HasegawaApoCell, Inc., Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Anoop MenacheryApoCell, Inc., Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Scott M LawrenceLaboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/ Developmental Research Support Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Lihua WangLaboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/ Developmental Research Support Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Katherine Ferry-GalowLaboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/ Developmental Research Support Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Darren DavisApoCell, Inc., Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Ralph E ParchmentLaboratory of Human Toxicology and Pharmacology, Applied/ Developmental Research Support Directorate, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research, Frederick, Maryland, United States of America.
Joseph E TomaszewskiDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
James H DoroshowDivision of Cancer Treatment and Diagnosis, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Leidos (United States) · USNational Cancer Institute · US

Funding

Phase 01 Clinical TrialsZIABC011078 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI DOROSHOW, JAMES · 2009 to 2025
$9.0M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are increasingly employed for research and clinical monitoring of cancer, though most current methods do not permit the isolation of non-epithelial tumor cells. Furthermore, CTCs isolated with antibody-dependent methods are not suitable for downstream experimental uses, including in vitro culturing and implantation in vivo. In the present study, we describe the development, validation, and transfer across laboratories of a new antibody-independent device for the enrichment of CTCs from blood samples of patients with various cancer diagnoses. The ApoStream® device uses dielectrophoresis (DEP) field-flow assist to separate non-hematopoietic cells from the peripheral blood mononuclear fraction by exposing cells in a laminar flow stream to a critical alternating current frequency. The ApoStream® device was calibrated and validated in a formal cross-laboratory protocol using 3 different cancer cell lines spanning a range of distinct phenotypes (A549, MDA-MB-231, and ASPS-1). In spike-recovery experiments, cancer cell recovery efficiencies appeared independent of spiking level and averaged between 68% and 55%, depending on the cell line. No inter-run carryover was detected in control samples. Moreover, the clinical-readiness of the device in the context of non-epithelial cancers was evaluated with blood specimens from fifteen patients with metastatic sarcoma. The ApoStream® device successfully isolated CTCs from all patients with sarcomas examined, and the phenotypic heterogeneity of the enriched cells was demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization or with multiplex immunophenotyping panels. Therefore, the ApoStream® technology expands the clinical utility of CTC evaluation to mesenchymal cancers.

Indexed as

A549 CellsBiomarkers, TumorCase-Control StudiesCell SeparationCo-Repressor ProteinsHumansNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingRepressor ProteinsSarcoma, Alveolar Soft PartBiomarkers, TumorCo-Repressor ProteinsRepressor ProteinsTLE1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID28403214
PMCPMC5389826
OpenAlexW2607071976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.