ArticlePloS one2017
Antibody-independent capture of circulating tumor cells of non-epithelial origin with the ApoStream® system.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 55 citations in OpenAlex.
- Circulating Tumor Cells: Emerging Frontiers in Cancer Technology.Expert reviews in molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Liquid biopsy of circulating tumor cells: From isolation, enrichment, and genome sequencing to clinical applications.Histology and histopathology · 2025Review
- Portable dielectrophoresis for biology: ADEPT facilitates cell trapping, separation, and interactions.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2024Article
- Review
- Article
- Recent Advances in Methods for Circulating Tumor Cell Detection.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Role of Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition for the Generation of Circulating Tumors Cells and Cancer Cell Dissemination.Cancers · 2022Review
- Fabrication of a new all-in-one microfluidic dielectrophoresis integrated chip and living cell separation.iScience · 2022Article
- Microfluidic-Based Technologies for CTC Isolation: A Review of 10 Years of Intense Efforts towards Liquid Biopsy.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Review
- Two-Step Acoustophoresis Separation of Live Tumor Cells from Whole Blood.Analytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Label-free enrichment of rare unconventional circulating neoplastic cells using a microfluidic dielectrophoretic sorting device.Communications biology · 2021Article
- Recent advances in blood-based and artificial intelligence-enhanced approaches for gastrointestinal cancer diagnosis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2021Review
- Methods of Generating Dielectrophoretic Force for Microfluidic Manipulation of Bioparticles.ACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2021Review
- Review
- Review
- A Review on Microdevices for Isolating Circulating Tumor Cells.Micromachines · 2020Review
- Interactions Between Tumor Biology and Targeted Nanoplatforms for Imaging Applications.Advanced functional materials · 2020Article
- The Role of Circulating Tumor Cells in the Metastatic Cascade: Biology, Technical Challenges, and Clinical Relevance.Cancers · 2020Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are increasingly employed for research and clinical monitoring of cancer, though most current methods do not permit the isolation of non-epithelial tumor cells. Furthermore, CTCs isolated with antibody-dependent methods are not suitable for downstream experimental uses, including in vitro culturing and implantation in vivo. In the present study, we describe the development, validation, and transfer across laboratories of a new antibody-independent device for the enrichment of CTCs from blood samples of patients with various cancer diagnoses. The ApoStream® device uses dielectrophoresis (DEP) field-flow assist to separate non-hematopoietic cells from the peripheral blood mononuclear fraction by exposing cells in a laminar flow stream to a critical alternating current frequency. The ApoStream® device was calibrated and validated in a formal cross-laboratory protocol using 3 different cancer cell lines spanning a range of distinct phenotypes (A549, MDA-MB-231, and ASPS-1). In spike-recovery experiments, cancer cell recovery efficiencies appeared independent of spiking level and averaged between 68% and 55%, depending on the cell line. No inter-run carryover was detected in control samples. Moreover, the clinical-readiness of the device in the context of non-epithelial cancers was evaluated with blood specimens from fifteen patients with metastatic sarcoma. The ApoStream® device successfully isolated CTCs from all patients with sarcomas examined, and the phenotypic heterogeneity of the enriched cells was demonstrated by fluorescence in situ hybridization or with multiplex immunophenotyping panels. Therefore, the ApoStream® technology expands the clinical utility of CTC evaluation to mesenchymal cancers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.