Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403210›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) in acute liver injury and graft dysfunction: Results from a case-control study.

Hans U Gerth, Michele Pohlen, Gerold Thölking, Hermann Pavenstädt, Marcus Brand, Christian Wilms, Anna Hüsing-Kabar, Dennis Görlich, Iyad Kabar, Hartmut H J Schmidt

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. End-stage liver failure: filling the treatment gap at the intensive care unit.Journal of artificial organs : the official journal of the Japanese Society for Artificial Organs · 2020
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Liver xenotransplantation.Current opinion in organ transplantation · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hans U GerthDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Michele PohlenDepartment of Medicine A, Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0333-0297
Gerold ThölkingDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Hermann PavenstädtDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Marcus BrandDepartment of Medicine D, Division of General Internal Medicine, Nephrology, and Rheumatology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Christian WilmsDepartment of Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Anna Hüsing-KabarDepartment of Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Dennis GörlichInstitute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Iyad KabarDepartment of Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
Hartmut H J SchmidtDepartment of Transplant Medicine, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany.
University Hospital Münster · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe primary therapeutic goals in the treatment of liver injury are to support liver regeneration or bridge the gap to liver transplantation (LT). Molecular adsorbent recirculating system (MARS) therapy has shown beneficial effects for specific symptoms of liver failure; however, general survival advantages have not yet been demonstrated.

aimWe studied the effects of MARS therapy compared to standard medical treatment (SMT) in two patient cohorts: in patients with an acute liver injury and in those with graft dysfunction (GD).

methodsWe report on our experience over a 6.5-year period with 73 patients treated with SMT or with SMT and MARS (MARS group). In total, 53 patients suffered from acute liver injury in their native liver without a preexisting liver disease (SMT: n = 31, MARS: n = 22), and 20 patients showed a severe GD after LT (SMT: n = 10, MARS: n = 10).

resultsThe entire cohort was predominantly characterized by hemodynamically and respiratorily stable patients with a low hepatic encephalopathy (HE) grade and a model of end-stage liver disease (MELD) score of 20.57 (MARS) or 22.51 (SMT, p = 0.555). Within the MARS group, the median number of extracorporeal therapy sessions was four (range = 3-5 sessions). Independent of the underlying etiology, MARS improved the patients' bilirubin values in the short term compared to SMT alone. In patients with acute liver injury, this response was sustained even after the end of MARS therapy. By contrast, the majority of patients with GD and an initial response to MARS therapy experienced worsened hyperbilirubinemia. No differences in 28-day mortality were observed with respect to acute liver injury (MARS 5.3% (95% CI: 0-15.3); SMT 3.3% (95% CI: 0-9.8), p = 0.754) or GD (MARS 20.0% (95% CI: 0-44.7), SMT 11.1% (95% CI: 0-31.7), p = 0.478).

conclusionsAlthough it did not improve 28-day mortality, MARS therapy improved the short-term response in patients with acute liver injury as well as in those with GD. In cases of acute hepatic injury, the use of MARS therapy resulted in the sustained stabilization of liver function and improved liver regeneration. A short-term response to MARS may predict the future course of the disease.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBilirubinCase-Control StudiesChemical and Drug Induced Liver InjuryFemaleGraft RejectionHumansLiverLiver RegenerationLiver TransplantationMaleMiddle AgedSorption DetoxificationTreatment OutcomeBilirubin

Identifiers

PMID28403210
PMCPMC5389829
OpenAlexW2607436017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.