ArticlePloS one2017
Identification of potential biomarkers in donor cows for in vitro embryo production by granulosa cell transcriptomics.
Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Application of omics technologies to identify reproductive phenotypes in the context of assisted reproductive technologies for cattle.Animal reproduction · 2026Article
- METTL7A improves bovine IVF embryo competence by attenuating oxidative stress†.Biology of reproduction · 2025Article
- Transcriptomic effects of alginate hydrogel applied to the production of bovine embryos.Heliyon · 2024Article
- METTL7A improves bovine IVF embryo competence by attenuating oxidative stress.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Biochemical profiling of the follicular environment to predict oocyte competence in cattle.PloS one · 2024Article
- Gene coexpression network analysis reveals perirenal adipose tissue as an important target of prenatal malnutrition in sheep.Physiological genomics · 2023Article
- Rapid ovarian transcript changes during the onset of premature ovarian insufficiency.Reproduction & fertility · 2022Article
- Contributions of RNA-seq to improveAnimal reproduction · 2019Review
- Differential expression and co-expression gene networks reveal candidate biomarkers of boar taint in non-castrated pigs.Scientific reports · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Ovum Pick Up-In vitro Production (OPU-IVP) of embryos is an advanced reproductive technology used in cattle production but the complex biological mechanisms behind IVP outcomes are not fully understood. In this study we sequenced RNA of granulosa cells collected from Holstein cows at oocyte aspiration prior to IVP, to identify candidate genes and biological mechanisms for favourable IVP-related traits in donor cows where IVP was performed separately for each animal. We identified 56 genes significantly associated with IVP scores (BL rate, kinetic and morphology). Among these, BEX2, HEY2, RGN, TNFAIP6 and TXNDC11 were negatively associated while Mx1 and STC1 were positively associated with all IVP scores. Functional analysis highlighted a wide range of biological mechanisms including apoptosis, cell development and proliferation and four key upstream regulators (COX2, IL1, PRL, TRIM24) involved in these mechanisms. We found a range of evidence that good IVP outcome is positively correlated with early follicular atresia. Furthermore we showed that high genetic index bulls can be used in breeding without reducing the IVP performances. These findings can contribute to the development of biomarkers from follicular fluid content and to improving Genomic Selection (GS) methods that utilize functional information in cattle breeding, allowing a widespread large scale application of GS-IVP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.