Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403181›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Mutational spectrum of Chinese LGMD patients by targeted next-generation sequencing.

Meng Yu, Yiming Zheng, Suqin Jin, Qiang Gang, Qingqing Wang, Peng Yu, He Lv, Wei Zhang, Yun Yuan, Zhaoxia Wang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Novel Variant inGenes · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Unique genotype-phenotype correlations withinFrontiers in neurology · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meng YuDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yiming ZhengDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Suqin JinDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qiang GangDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Qingqing WangDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Peng YuScience and Technology, Precisionmdx Inc., Beijing, China.
He LvDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Wei ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yun YuanDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.
Zhaoxia WangDepartment of Neurology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-4242
Peking University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to study the diagnostic value of targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) in limb-girdle muscular dystrophies (LGMDs), and investigate the mutational spectrum of Chinese LGMD patients. We performed targeted NGS covering 420 genes in 180 patients who were consecutively suspected of LGMDs and underwent muscle biopsies from January 2013 to May 2015. The association between genotype and myopathological profiles was analyzed in the genetically confirmed LGMD patients. With targeted NGS, one or more rare variants were detected in 138 patients, of whom 113 had causative mutations, 10 sporadic patients had one pathogenic heterozygous mutation related to a recessive pattern of LGMDs, and 15 had variants of uncertain significance. No disease-causing mutation was found in the remaining 42 patients. Combined with the myopathological findings, we achieved a positive genetic diagnostic rate as 68.3% (123/180). Totally 105 patients were diagnosed as LGMDs with genetic basis. Among these 105 patients, the most common subtypes were LGMD2B in 52 (49.5%), LGMD2A in 26 (24.8%) and LGMD 2D in eight (7.6%), followed by LGMD1B in seven (6.7%), LGMD1E in four (3.8%), LGMD2I in three (2.9%), and LGMD2E, 2F, 2H, 2K, 2L in one patient (1.0%), respectively. Although some characteristic pathological changes may suggest certain LGMD subtypes, both heterogeneous findings in a certain subtype and overlapping presentations among different subtypes were not uncommon. The application of NGS, together with thorough clinical and myopathological evaluation, can substantially improve the molecular diagnostic rate in LGMDs. Confirming the genetic diagnosis in LGMD patients can help improve our understanding of their myopathological changes.

Indexed as

MutationAdolescentAdultAsian PeopleChildChild, PreschoolChinaFemaleGenotypeHeterozygoteHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMusclesMuscular Dystrophies, Limb-GirdleYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID28403181
PMCPMC5389788
OpenAlexW2605609575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.