Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403164›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Characterising the latent structure and organisation of self-reported thoughts, feelings and behaviours in adolescents and young adults.

Michelle C St Clair, Sharon Neufeld, Peter B Jones, Peter Fonagy, Edward T Bullmore, Raymond J Dolan, Michael Moutoussis, Umar Toseeb, Ian M Goodyer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. A Hierarchical Model of the Symptom-Level Structure of Psychopathology in Youth.Clinical psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Flattening the quality of life curve? A prospective person-centred study from Norway amid COVID-19.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michelle C St ClairDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4015-7435
Sharon NeufeldDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter B JonesDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Peter FonagyDivision of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Edward T BullmoreDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Raymond J DolanMax Planck UCL Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Michael MoutoussisWellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Umar ToseebDepartment of Psychology, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Ian M GoodyerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095844
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the underlying relationships between self-reported mental health items measuring both positive and negative emotional and behavioural symptoms at the population level in young people. Improved measurement of the full range of mental well-being and mental illness may aid in understanding the aetiological substrates underlying the development of both mental wellness as well as specific psychiatric diagnoses. A general population sample aged 14 to 24 years completed self-report questionnaires on anxiety, depression, psychotic-like symptoms, obsessionality and well-being. Exploratory and confirmatory factor models for categorical data and latent profile analyses were used to evaluate the structure of both mental wellness and illness items. First order, second order and bifactor structures were evaluated on 118 self-reported items obtained from 2228 participants. A bifactor solution was the best fitting latent variable model with one general latent factor termed 'distress' and five 'distress independent' specific factors defined as self-confidence, antisocial behaviour, worry, aberrant thinking, and mood. Next, six distinct subgroups were derived from a person-centred latent profile analysis of the factor scores. Finally, concurrent validity was assessed using information on hazardous behaviours (alcohol use, substance misuse, self-harm) and treatment for mental ill health: both discriminated between the latent traits and latent profile subgroups. The findings suggest a complex, multidimensional mental health structure in the youth population rather than the previously assumed first or second order factor structure. Additionally, the analysis revealed a low hazardous behaviour/low mental illness risk subgroup not previously described. Population sub-groups show greater validity over single variable factors in revealing mental illness risks. In conclusion, our findings indicate that the structure of self reported mental health is multidimensional in nature and uniquely finds improved prediction to mental illness risk within person-centred subgroups derived from the multidimensional latent traits.

Indexed as

EmotionsSelf ReportAdolescentAdultAnxietyAnxiety DisordersDepressionDepressive DisorderFactor Analysis, StatisticalFemaleHumansMaleObsessive BehaviorPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID28403164
PMCPMC5389661

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.