Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403143›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2017

A novel mechanism of cone photoreceptor adaptation.

Marcus H C Howlett, Robert G Smith, Maarten Kamermans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Photopic flicker optoretinography captures the light-driven length modulation of photoreceptors during phototransduction.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Ultrafast spectra and kinetics of human green-cone visual pigment at room temperature.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Cone-Driven Retinal Responses Are Shaped by Rod But Not Cone HCN1.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Heteromeric KThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marcus H C HowlettRetinal Signal Processing lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert G SmithDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.
Maarten KamermansRetinal Signal Processing lab, Netherlands Institute for Neuroscience, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0847-828X

Funding

Retinal circuits for precise signalingR01EY016607 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI SMITH, ROBERT G · 2006 to 2014
$2.7M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY016607
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An animal's ability to survive depends on its sensory systems being able to adapt to a wide range of environmental conditions, by maximizing the information extracted and reducing the noise transmitted. The visual system does this by adapting to luminance and contrast. While luminance adaptation can begin at the retinal photoreceptors, contrast adaptation has been shown to start at later stages in the retina. Photoreceptors adapt to changes in luminance over multiple time scales ranging from tens of milliseconds to minutes, with the adaptive changes arising from processes within the phototransduction cascade. Here we show a new form of adaptation in cones that is independent of the phototransduction process. Rather, it is mediated by voltage-gated ion channels in the cone membrane and acts by changing the frequency response of cones such that their responses speed up as the membrane potential modulation depth increases and slow down as the membrane potential modulation depth decreases. This mechanism is effectively activated by high-contrast stimuli dominated by low frequencies such as natural stimuli. However, the more generally used Gaussian white noise stimuli were not effective since they did not modulate the cone membrane potential to the same extent. This new adaptive process had a time constant of less than a second. A critical component of the underlying mechanism is the hyperpolarization-activated current, Ih, as pharmacologically blocking it prevented the long- and mid- wavelength sensitive cone photoreceptors (L- and M-cones) from adapting. Consistent with this, short- wavelength sensitive cone photoreceptors (S-cones) did not show the adaptive response, and we found they also lacked a prominent Ih. The adaptive filtering mechanism identified here improves the information flow by removing higher-frequency noise during lower signal-to-noise ratio conditions, as occurs when contrast levels are low. Although this new adaptive mechanism can be driven by contrast, it is not a contrast adaptation mechanism in its strictest sense, as will be argued in the Discussion.

Indexed as

Adaptation, OcularAction PotentialsAnimalsGoldfishKineticsRetinal Cone Photoreceptor Cells

Identifiers

PMID28403143
PMCPMC5389785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.