Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28403099›Full record

ArticleMedicine2017

US-guided percutaneous laser ablation of refractory metastatic retroperitoneal lesions: A care-compliant case report.

Guo Tian, Tian'an Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Guo TianState Key Laboratory for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Collaborative Innovation Center for Diagnosis and Treatment of Infectious Diseases Department of Ultrasound Medicine, the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Treatment for Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Tumor of Zhejiang Province, Hangzhou, China.
Tian'an Jiang
Twin Cities Public Television · USZhejiang University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleRetroperitoneal metastatic lymph node is rare but severe, which has important structures like the gastrointestinal tract and large blood vessels around and may challenge excision, inducing serious complications like hemorrhage, intestinal adhesion, and even death after injury. PATIENT CONCERNS: We described the case of a 60-year-old man with a history of right liver resection in 2010, pulmonary wedge resection in 2012, and transarterial chemoembolization twice in 2014, in which the postoperative pathology suggested the mixed liver cancer, and poorly differentiated lung cancer from liver metastasis. DIAGNOSES: Preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) imaging scan showed a refractory retroperitoneal metastatic lymph node.

interventionsThen this patient repeatedly received 4 ablations with US-guided laser ablation within a month. OUTCOMES: After 4 ablations due to residual tumor, MR, and CT images of 5-month follow-up showed the partial response. No obvious side effects were discovered in this case during these procedures. LESSONS: This suggested US-guided laser ablation appears to be a useful technique for retroperitoneal metastatic lymph node with poor general condition or those refusing surgical therapy.

Indexed as

HumansLaser TherapyLiver NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsRetroperitoneal SpaceTreatment OutcomeUltrasonography, Interventional

Identifiers

PMID28403099
PMCPMC5403096
OpenAlexW2606125589

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.