Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28402938›Full record

ReviewOncotarget2017

Cathepsins in digestive cancers.

Siyuan Chen, Hui Dong, Shiming Yang, Hong Guo

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Theranostic Fluorescent Probes.Chemical reviews · 2024
    Review
  5. Dynamic changes of DNA methylation induced by benzo(a)pyrene in cancer.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Electrospun Poly(acrylic acid-Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Biotechnological Potential ofPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siyuan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hui DongDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Shiming YangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Hong GuoDepartment of Gastroenterology, Xinqiao Hospital, Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xinqiao Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cathepsins are lysosomal peptidases belonging to the papain family, and based on their catalytic sites, these enzymes can be divided into serine, cysteine and aspartic proteases. The studies conducted to date have identified, 15 types of cathepsins that are widely distributed in intracellular and extracellular spaces. These proteases participate in various pathological activities, including the occurrence and development of human cancers. Several recent studies suggest that cathepsins, particularly cathepsins B, D, E and L, contribute to digestive tumorigenesis. Cathepsins were found to promote the development of most digestive cancers except liver cancer, in which they might have the opposite effects. Due to their important roles in digestive tumors, cathepsins might be therapeutic targets for the treatment of digestive cancers.

Indexed as

CathepsinsCell MovementCell ProliferationGastrointestinal NeoplasmsHumansCathepsinscathepsindigestive cancerinvasionmigrationproliferation

Identifiers

PMID28402938
PMCPMC5522190
OpenAlexW2598101424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.