ArticleSurgical infections
Electronic Surveillance of Surgical Site Infections.
Article in Surgical infections. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Automated Identification of Postoperative Infections to Allow Prediction and Surveillance Based on Electronic Health Record Data: Scoping Review.JMIR medical informatics · 2024Article
- Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update.Infection control and hospital epidemiology · 2023Article
- Novel Method to Flag Cardiac Implantable Device Infections by Integrating Text Mining With Structured Data in the Veterans Health Administration's Electronic Medical Record.JAMA network open · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundElectronic health and administrative data are increasingly being used for identifying surgical site infections (SSI). We found an unexpectedly high number of patients who could not be classified definitively as having an infection or not. To further explore this, we present an electronic classification algorithm for conservative case finding and identify alterations that would adapt the method for other purposes.
methodsTwo computer algorithms were created to identify SSI. One model used a strict National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) based SSI algorithm, which was applied to all discharges from 443,284 all discharges from four hospitals in Manhattan, NY, 2009 through 2012. The second model used discharges that only had NHSN-defined SSI procedures during the same period.
resultsThe strict SSI algorithm was able to classify SSI status for 27.3% of discharges; there was a high number of indeterminate cases. In contrast, the modified, less strict model, classified 97.2% of discharges with NHSN-approved SSI procedures.
conclusionElectronic records provide several options for aiding with the identification of infections in healthcare settings and can be tailored to suit specific uses. While algorithms for SSI classification should reflect the NHSN definition, our research emphasizes how variations of model building can affect the number of indeterminate cases that may necessitate manual review.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.