Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28402507›Full record

ArticleSchizophrenia bulletin2017

Thoughts About Disordered Thinking: Measuring and Quantifying the Laws of Order and Disorder.

Brita Elvevåg, Peter W Foltz, Mark Rosenstein, Ramon Ferrer-I-Cancho, Simon De Deyne, Eduardo Mizraji, Alex Cohen

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. The topography of thought.PNAS nexus · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Validating digital phenotyping technologies for clinical use: the critical importance of "resolution".World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2020
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Information Theory and Cognition: A Review.Entropy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Can RDoC Help Find Order in Thought Disorder?Schizophrenia bulletin · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Brita ElvevågDepartment of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Peter W FoltzInstitute of Cognitive Science, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Mark RosensteinAdvanced Computing and Data Science Laboratory, Pearson, Boulder, CO, USA.
Ramon Ferrer-I-CanchoComplexity and Quantitative Linguistics Lab, Departament de Ciències de la Computació, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.
Simon De DeyneComputational Cognitive Science Lab, School of Psychology, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia.
Eduardo MizrajiGroup of Cognitive Systems Modeling, Biophysics Section, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay.
Alex CohenDepartment of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

SchizophreniaHumansThinkingcomputational semanticsnetwork theoryquantitative linguisticsserious mental illness

Identifiers

PMID28402507
PMCPMC5464160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.