Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28402326›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical nutrition2017

Chocolate intake and diabetes risk in postmenopausal American women.

J A Greenberg, J E Manson, L Tinker, M L Neuhouser, L Garcia, M Z Vitolins, L S Phillips

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. What Makes Nutrition Research So Difficult to Conduct and Interpret?Diabetes spectrum : a publication of the American Diabetes Association · 2020
    Article
  7. Effects of Cocoa Antioxidants in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

J A GreenbergDepartment of Health and Nutrition Sciences, Brooklyn College of the City University of New York, Brooklyn, NY, USA.
J E MansonDepartment of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
L TinkerDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
M L NeuhouserDivision of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
L GarciaDepartment of Public Health Sciences, Davis, CA, USA.
M Z VitolinsDepartment of Epidemiology and Prevention, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.
L S PhillipsClinical Studies Center, Atlanta VA Medical Center, Decatur, GA, USA.
Fred Hutch Cancer Center · USAtlanta VA Medical Center · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USCity University of New York · USWake Forest University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectivesRecent long-term prospective cohort studies found inverse associations between chocolate consumption and the risk of type 2 diabetes, but provided conflicting evidence on the nature of the association among women. To assess this association in a large cohort of American women. SUBJECTS/

methodsMultivariable Cox regression was used with the data from 92 678 postmenopausal women in the prospective Women's Health Initiative study. Chocolate intake was assessed by food frequency questionnaire. Incidence of type 2 diabetes was determined by self-report of the first treatment with oral medication or insulin.

resultsAmong women free of diabetes at baseline, there were 10 804 cases, representing an incidence rate of 11.7% during 13.1 years and 1 164 498 person-years of follow-up. There was no significant linear association between long-term chocolate intake and type 2 diabetes risk, but there was significantly reduced risk at moderate levels of intake. Compared to women who ate 1 oz. of chocolate <1 time per month, those who ate this amount 1-<1.5 times per month, 1.5-<3.5 times per month, 3.5 times per month to <3 times per week and ⩾3 times per week had hazard ratios of 0.97 (95% confidence interval: 0.92, 1.04), 0.92 (0.87, 0.98), 0.93 (0.88, 0.98) and 0.98 (0.92, 1.04) (P for linear trend=0.79). There was only evidence of such inverse associations for women with below-median physical activity (P for interaction <0.0001) and those with age<65 years (P=0.01).

conclusionsWe only found an inverse association between chocolate consumption and type 2 diabetes at moderate levels of consumption in two subgroups of postmenopausal women in the Women's Health initiative cohort.

Indexed as

ChocolateEatingAgedCohort StudiesDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMiddle AgedPostmenopauseProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurvival AnalysisUnited StatesWomen's Health

Identifiers

PMID28402326
OpenAlexW2606756486

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.