Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28401958›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Replacing Sanger with Next Generation Sequencing to improve coverage and quality of reference DNA barcodes for plants.

Mike J Wilkinson, Claudia Szabo, Caroline S Ford, Yuval Yarom, Adam E Croxford, Amanda Camp, Paul Gooding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Plant-feeding phlebotomine sand flies, vectors of leishmaniasis, preferProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mike J WilkinsonPwllpeiran Upland Research Centre, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion, SY23 4AB, UK.
Claudia SzaboSchool of Computer Science, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Caroline S FordPwllpeiran Upland Research Centre, Institute of Biological, Environmental and Rural Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Ceredigion, SY23 4AB, UK.
Yuval YaromSchool of Computer Science, The University of Adelaide, SA 5005, Australia.
Adam E CroxfordSchool of Agriculture, Food and Wine, Waite Campus, The University of Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia.
Amanda CampSchool of Animal &Veterinary Sciences, Roseworthy Campus, The University of Adelaide, SA 5371, Australia.
Paul GoodingAustralian Genome Research Facility, Plant Genomics Centre, Hartley Grove, Urrbrae, SA 5064, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We estimate the global BOLD Systems database holds core DNA barcodes (rbcL + matK) for about 15% of land plant species and that comprehensive species coverage is still many decades away. Interim performance of the resource is compromised by variable sequence overlap and modest information content within each barcode. Our model predicts that the proportion of species-unique barcodes reduces as the database grows and that 'false' species-unique barcodes remain >5% until the database is almost complete. We conclude the current rbcL + matK barcode is unfit for purpose. Genome skimming and supplementary barcodes could improve diagnostic power but would slow new barcode acquisition. We therefore present two novel Next Generation Sequencing protocols (with freeware) capable of accurate, massively parallel de novo assembly of high quality DNA barcodes of >1400 bp. We explore how these capabilities could enhance species diagnosis in the coming decades.

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticDNA Barcoding, TaxonomicDNA, PlantHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingPhylogenyPlantsReference StandardsSonicationSpecies SpecificityDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID28401958
PMCPMC5388885

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.