Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28401843›Full record

Trial reportDevelopment and psychopathology2017

Circle of Security-Parenting: A randomized controlled trial in Head Start.

Jude Cassidy, Bonnie E Brett, Jacquelyn T Gross, Jessica A Stern, David R Martin, Jonathan J Mohr, Susan S Woodhouse

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Development and psychopathology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04244318 (Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Results of the ODISEA-T Model, in a Sample of Fathers, Mothers and/or Caregivers and Children and Adolescents Belonging to AFT Programs of La Protectora de la Infancia, Chile.), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04244318 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Randomized Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Results of the ODISEA-T Model, in a Sample of Fathers, Mothers and/or Caregivers and Children and Adolescents Belonging to AFT Programs of La Protectora de la Infancia, Chile.

TypeinterventionalSponsorEsteban Gómez MuzzioRan2024 to 2025Enrolled153ConditionsParent-Child Relations, Parenting, Parent-child ProblemArmsVideo-feedback ODISEA 3.0, ODISEA-DTP: parental therapy, Treatment as usual
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jude CassidyUniversity of Maryland at College Park.
Bonnie E BrettUniversity of Maryland at College Park.
Jacquelyn T GrossUniversity of Maryland at College Park.
Jessica A SternUniversity of Maryland at College Park.
David R MartinUniversity of Maryland at College Park.
Jonathan J MohrUniversity of Maryland at College Park.
Susan S WoodhouseLehigh University.
University of Maryland, College Park · USLehigh University · US

Funding

Caregiving, Attachment, and Regulation of Emotion (CARE)R01HD068594 · NICHD · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY, THE · PI WOODHOUSE, SUSAN SOLEDAD · 2012 to 2016
$2.5M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD068594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although evidence shows that attachment insecurity and disorganization increase risk for the development of psychopathology (Fearon, Bakermans-Kranenburg, van IJzendoorn, Lapsley, & Roisman, 2010; Groh, Roisman, van IJzendoorn, Bakermans-Kranenburg, & Fearon, 2012), implementation challenges have precluded dissemination of attachment interventions on the broad scale at which they are needed. The Circle of Security-Parenting Intervention (COS-P; Cooper, Hoffman, & Powell, 2009), designed with broad implementation in mind, addresses this gap by training community service providers to use a manualized, video-based program to help caregivers provide a secure base and a safe haven for their children. The present study is a randomized controlled trial of COS-P in a low-income sample of Head Start enrolled children and their mothers. Mothers (N = 141; 75 intervention, 66 waitlist control) completed a baseline assessment and returned with their children after the 10-week intervention for the outcome assessment, which included the Strange Situation. Intent to treat analyses revealed a main effect for maternal response to child distress, with mothers assigned to COS-P reporting fewer unsupportive (but not more supportive) responses to distress than control group mothers, and a main effect for one dimension of child executive functioning (inhibitory control but not cognitive flexibility when maternal age and marital status were controlled), with intervention group children showing greater control. There were, however, no main effects of intervention for child attachment or behavior problems. Exploratory follow-up analyses suggested intervention effects were moderated by maternal attachment style or depressive symptoms, with moderated intervention effects emerging for child attachment security and disorganization, but not avoidance; for inhibitory control but not cognitive flexibility; and for child internalizing but not externalizing behavior problems. This initial randomized controlled trial of the efficacy of COS-P sets the stage for further exploration of "what works for whom" in attachment intervention.

Indexed as

Early Intervention, EducationalObject AttachmentOutcome Assessment, Health CareChild BehaviorChild, PreschoolDepressionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMothersParentingProblem BehaviorPsychotherapy

Identifiers

PMID28401843
PMCPMC5543687
OpenAlexW2606645606

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.