Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28401350›Full record

SynthesisInternational journal of colorectal disease2017

Peritoneal fluid biomarkers in the detection of colorectal anastomotic leaks: a systematic review.

Emma C Wright, Patricia Connolly, Mark Vella, Susan Moug

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in International journal of colorectal disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04846283 (Drainage Fluid Biomarkers And Anastomotic Leakage In Colorectal Surgery. A Monocentric Prospective Observational Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04846283 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Drainage Fluid Biomarkers And Anastomotic Leakage In Colorectal Surgery. A Monocentric Prospective Observational Study

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of PalermoRan2018 to 2020Enrolled207ConditionsAnastomotic LeakageArmsElective or emergency colorectal surgery for cancer, diverticular disease, inflammatory bowel-disease or reversal of Hartmann's procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. A multicentre cohort study of serum and peritoneal biomarkers to predict anastomotic leakage after rectal cancer resection.Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · 2020
    Article
  14. Biomarker Guided Diagnosis of Septic Peritonitis in Dogs.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Emma C WrightDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Ward 26 Day Room, Corsebar Road, Paisley, PA2 9PN, UK. Emmawright8@nhs.net.
Patricia ConnollyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wolfson Centre, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, G4 0NW, UK.
Mark VellaDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Ward 26 Day Room, Corsebar Road, Paisley, PA2 9PN, UK.
Susan MougDepartment of General Surgery, Royal Alexandra Hospital, Ward 26 Day Room, Corsebar Road, Paisley, PA2 9PN, UK.
Royal Alexandra Hospital · GBUniversity of Strathclyde · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAnastomotic leak (AL) in colorectal surgery leads to significant morbidity, mortality and poorer oncological outcomes. Diagnosis of AL is frequently delayed as current methods of detection are not 100% sensitive or specific. 'Biomarkers', such as cytokines and markers of ischaemia, from the milieu of the anastomosis may aid early detection. This paper aims to review the evidence for their role in AL detection, allowing identification of targets for future research.

methodsA systematic review was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE and Cochrane Library databases. Papers concerning detection or prediction of AL with biomarkers were identified. References within the papers were used to identify further relevant articles.

resultsResearch has taken place in small cohorts with varying definitions of AL. Lactate has consistently been shown to be elevated in patients with intra-abdominal complications and ALs. pH on post-operative day 3 showed excellent specificity. Despite mixed results, a meta-analysis found that the cytokines tumour necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6 were elevated early in AL. Detection of bacteria in drain fluid by RT-PCR has good specificity but a high rate of false positives.

conclusionsPeritoneal cytokines, lactate and pH have the potential to identify AL early. The consistency of the results for lactate and pH, alongside the fact that they are easy, quick and inexpensive to test, makes them the most attractive targets. Studies in larger cohorts with standardized definitions of AL are required to clarify their usefulness. Emerging biosensor technology may facilitate the development of small, low-cost and degradable intra-abdominal devices to measure peritoneal fluid biomarkers.

Indexed as

Anastomotic LeakAscitic FluidBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsCytokinesHumansInflammationIschemiaBiomarkers, TumorCytokinesAnastomotic leakColorectal surgeryLactate

Identifiers

PMID28401350
OpenAlexW2607496315

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.