Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28401345›Full record

GuidelineEuropean journal of pediatrics2017

Vitamin D in European children-statement from the European Academy of Paediatrics (EAP).

Zachi Grossman, Adamos Hadjipanayis, Tom Stiris, Stefano Del Torso, Jean-Christophe Mercier, Arunas Valiulis, Raanan Shamir

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in European journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 96 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Approach to Rickets: Is It Calciopenic or Phosphopenic?Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2023
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 6 countries.

Zachi GrossmanPediatric Clinic, Maccabi Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Adamos HadjipanayisDepartment of Paediatrics, Larnaca General Hospital, Larnaca, Cyprus. adamos@paidiatros.com.
Tom StirisDepartment of Neonatology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Stefano Del TorsoDipartimento della Sanità Pubblica, ULSS 6, Padova, Italy.
Jean-Christophe MercierService de Pédiatrie-Urgences, Hôpital Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris and Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France.
Arunas ValiulisVilnius University Clinic of Children's Diseases and Public Health Institute, Vilnius, Lithuania.
Raanan ShamirInstitute for Gastroenterology, Nutrition and Liver Diseases, Schneider Children's Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Hôpital Louis-Mourier · FRMaccabi Health Care Services · ILOslo University Hospital · NOSocietà Italiana di Cardiologia · ITTel Aviv University · ILUniversity of Cyprus · CYVilnius University · LT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Vitamin D is synthesized in human skin upon sun exposure and is also a nutrient. It regulates calcium and phosphate metabolism and is essential for the maintenance of bone health. Vitamin D supplementation during infancy, in order to prevent rickets, is universally accepted. Many human cell types carry vitamin D receptor, this being a drive for conducting studies on the possible association between vitamin D status and other diseases. Studies have affirmed that a considerable number of healthy European children may be vitamin D deficient, especially in high-risk groups (darker pigmented skin, living in areas with reduced sun exposure and other disorders). However, the definition of deficiency is unclear due to inter assay differences and due to a lack of consensus as to what is an "adequate" 25(OH)D level. Therefore, there is no justification for routine screening for vitamin D deficiency in healthy children. An evaluation of vitamin D status is justified in children belonging to high-risk groups. All infants up to 1 year of age should receive an oral supplementation of 400 IU/day of vitamin D. Beyond this age, seasonal variation of sunlight should be taken into account when considering a national policy of supplementation or fortification.

Indexed as

ChildChild, PreschoolDietary SupplementsEuropeHumansInfantRecommended Dietary AllowancesVitamin DVitamin D DeficiencyVitaminsVitamin DVitaminsEuropean Academy of PaediatricsVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID28401345
OpenAlexW2607347466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.