Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28401331›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical psychology in medical settings2017

Now is the Time for Psychology to Support the Transformation of Academic Health Centers.

John C Linton

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Quality Improvement in Health Care: The Role of Psychologists and Psychology.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

John C LintonWest Virginia University School of Medicine, 3110 MacCorkle Avenue, SE, Charleston, WV, 25304, USA. jlinton@hsc.wvu.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Psychologists have made important contributions in academic health centers (AHC), but the reputation of psychology as a discipline has been mixed, by turns viewed as a superfluous soft science, or seen as an important contributor to the AHC mission. AHCs currently face exceptional challenges to the viability of AHCs, including: planned alterations from fee-for-service to value-based funding that requires high quality at lower cost; and rising demands to demonstrate competence in trainees. Now more than ever, psychologists can and must help AHCs to meet these challenges.

Indexed as

Academic Medical CentersPsychologyQuality of Health CareHumansUnited StatesAcademic health centersAcademic medicineBehavioral science in medical educationHealth care transformation

Identifiers

PMID28401331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.