Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28401131›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Perceptions and experiences of a gender gap at a Canadian research institute and potential strategies to mitigate this gap: a sequential mixed-methods study.

Alekhya Mascarenhas, Julia E Moore, Andrea C Tricco, Jemila Hamid, Caitlin Daly, Julie Bain, Sabrina Jassemi, Tara Kiran, Nancy Baxter, Sharon E Straus

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. KRESCENT; 2005-2025 - 20 years! Editorial.Canadian journal of kidney health and disease · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Gender-based differences in physician payments within the fee-for-service system in Ontario: a retrospective, cross-sectional study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Closing the gender pay gap in Canadian medicine.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Alekhya MascarenhasLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Julia E MooreLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Andrea C TriccoLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Jemila HamidLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Caitlin DalyLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Julie BainLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Sabrina JassemiLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Tara KiranLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Nancy BaxterLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.
Sharon E StrausLi Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital; University of Toronto, Toronto, Ont.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe gender gap in academia is long-standing. Failure to ensure that our academic faculty reflect our student pool and national population deprives Canada of talent. We explored the gender distribution and perceptions of the gender gap at a Canadian university-affiliated, hospital-based research institute.

methodsWe completed a sequential mixed-methods study. In phase 1, we used the research institute's registry of scientists (1999-2014) and estimated overall prevalence of a gender gap and the gap with respect to job description (e.g., associate v. full-time) and research discipline. In phase 2, we conducted qualitative interviews to provide context for phase 1 data. Both purposive and snowball sampling were used for recruitment.

resultsThe institute included 30.1% (

interpretationA substantial gender gap exists within this research institute. Participants identified strategies to address this gap, such as establishing transparent search processes, providing opportunities for informal networking and mentorship of female scientists and establishing institutional support for work-life balance.

Identifiers

PMID28401131
PMCPMC5378536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.