Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28401122›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Quality indicators for the detection and management of chronic kidney disease in primary care in Canada derived from a modified Delphi panel approach.

Karen Tu, Lindsay Bevan, Katie Hunter, Jess Rogers, Jacqueline Young, Gihad Nesrallah

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
26.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Trends in Quality of Care for Patients with CKD in the United States.Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Karen TuInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Tu, Young), Department of Family and Community Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Tu), University of Toronto; Centre for Effective Practice (Bevan); Faculty of Medicine (Hunter, Rogers), University of Toronto; Nephrology Program (Nesrallah), Humber River Hospital; Keenan Research Centre (Nesrallah), The Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Lindsay BevanInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Tu, Young), Department of Family and Community Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Tu), University of Toronto; Centre for Effective Practice (Bevan); Faculty of Medicine (Hunter, Rogers), University of Toronto; Nephrology Program (Nesrallah), Humber River Hospital; Keenan Research Centre (Nesrallah), The Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Katie HunterInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Tu, Young), Department of Family and Community Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Tu), University of Toronto; Centre for Effective Practice (Bevan); Faculty of Medicine (Hunter, Rogers), University of Toronto; Nephrology Program (Nesrallah), Humber River Hospital; Keenan Research Centre (Nesrallah), The Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Jess RogersInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Tu, Young), Department of Family and Community Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Tu), University of Toronto; Centre for Effective Practice (Bevan); Faculty of Medicine (Hunter, Rogers), University of Toronto; Nephrology Program (Nesrallah), Humber River Hospital; Keenan Research Centre (Nesrallah), The Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Jacqueline YoungInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Tu, Young), Department of Family and Community Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Tu), University of Toronto; Centre for Effective Practice (Bevan); Faculty of Medicine (Hunter, Rogers), University of Toronto; Nephrology Program (Nesrallah), Humber River Hospital; Keenan Research Centre (Nesrallah), The Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Gihad NesrallahInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (Tu, Young), Department of Family and Community Medicine and Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation (Tu), University of Toronto; Centre for Effective Practice (Bevan); Faculty of Medicine (Hunter, Rogers), University of Toronto; Nephrology Program (Nesrallah), Humber River Hospital; Keenan Research Centre (Nesrallah), The Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Toronto, Ont.
Humber River Regional Hospital · CARogers (United States) · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe detection and management of chronic kidney disease lies within primary care; however, performance measures applicable in the Canadian context are lacking. We sought to develop a set of primary care quality indicators for chronic kidney disease in the Canadian setting and to assess the current state of the disease's detection and management in primary care.

methodsWe used a modified Delphi panel approach, involving 20 panel members from across Canada (10 family physicians, 7 nephrologists, 1 patient, 1 primary care nurse and 1 pharmacist). Indicators identified from peer-reviewed and grey literature sources were subjected to 3 rounds of voting to develop a set of quality indicators for the detection and management of chronic kidney disease in the primary care setting. The final indicators were applied to primary care electronic medical records in the Electronic Medical Record Administrative data Linked Database (EMRALD) to assess the current state of primary care detection and management of chronic kidney disease in Ontario.

resultsSeventeen indicators made up the final list, with 1 under the category Prevalence, Incidence and Mortality; 4 under Screening, Diagnosis and Risk Factors; 11 under Management; and 1 under Referral to a Specialist. In a sample of 139 993 adult patients not on dialysis, 6848 (4.9%) had stage 3 or higher chronic kidney disease, with the average age of patients being 76.1 years (standard deviation [SD] 11.0); 62.9% of patients were female. Diagnosis and screening for chronic kidney disease were poorly performed. Only 27.1% of patients with stage 3 or higher disease had their diagnosis documented in their cumulative patient profile. Albumin-creatinine ratio testing was only performed for 16.3% of patients with a low estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and for 28.5% of patients with risk factors for chronic kidney disease. Family physicians performed relatively better with the management of chronic kidney disease, with 90.4% of patients with stage 3 or higher disease having an eGFR performed in the previous 18 months and 83.1% having a blood pressure recorded in the previous 9 months.

interpretationWe propose a set of measurable indicators to evaluate the quality of the management of chronic kidney disease in primary care. These indicators may be used to identify opportunities to improve current practice in Canada.

Identifiers

PMID28401122
PMCPMC5378542
OpenAlexW2581597236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.