Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28401114›Full record

ArticleCMAJ open

Time trends in organ donation after neurologic determination of death: a cohort study.

Andreas H Kramer, Ryan Baht, Christopher J Doig

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CMAJ open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Hemodynamic management in brain dead donors.World journal of transplantation · 2021
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Trends in deceased organ donation in Canada.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2017
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andreas H KramerDepartments of Critical Care Medicine (Kramer, Doig) and Clinical Neurosciences (Kramer), University of Calgary; Southern Alberta Organ and Tissue Donation Program (Kramer, Baht); Department of Community Health Sciences (Doig), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Ryan BahtDepartments of Critical Care Medicine (Kramer, Doig) and Clinical Neurosciences (Kramer), University of Calgary; Southern Alberta Organ and Tissue Donation Program (Kramer, Baht); Department of Community Health Sciences (Doig), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
Christopher J DoigDepartments of Critical Care Medicine (Kramer, Doig) and Clinical Neurosciences (Kramer), University of Calgary; Southern Alberta Organ and Tissue Donation Program (Kramer, Baht); Department of Community Health Sciences (Doig), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alta.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe cause of brain injury may influence the number of organs that can be procured and transplanted with donation following neurologic determination of death. We investigated whether the distribution of causes responsible for neurologic death has changed over time and, if so, whether this has had an impact on organ quality, transplantation rates and recipient outcomes.

methodsWe performed a cohort study involving consecutive brain-dead organ donors in southern Alberta between 2003 and 2014. For each donor, we determined last available measures of organ injury and number of organs transplanted, and compared these variables for various causes of neurologic death. We compared trends to national Canadian data for 2000-2013 (2000-2011 for Quebec).

resultsThere were 226 brain-dead organ donors over the study period, of whom 100 (44.2%) had anoxic brain injury, 63 (27.9%) had stroke, and 51 (22.6%) had traumatic brain injury. The relative proportion of donors with traumatic brain injury decreased over time (> 30% in 2003-2005 v. 6%-23% in 2012-2014) (

interpretationAnoxic brain injury has become a leading cause of organ donation after neurologic determination of death in Canada. Organs from donors with anoxic brain injury have a greater degree of injury, and fewer are transplanted. These findings have implications for availability of organs for transplantation in patients with end-stage organ failure.

Identifiers

PMID28401114
PMCPMC5378522
OpenAlexW2572825480

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.