ArticleWorld journal of cardiology2017
Risk of ventricular arrhythmia in patients with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries and normal ejection fraction.
Article in World journal of cardiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute Complications in Patients with Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Systematic Review with Special Focus on Mechanical Complications.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Pooled it
- 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.Heart rhythm · 2021Guideline
- Myocarditis in Relation to Angiographic Findings in Patients With Provisional Diagnoses of MINOCA.JACC. Cardiovascular imaging · 2020Pooled it
- Cardiac MRI in MINOCA: Current Evidence, Parametric Mapping Advances, and Future AI Applications-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Ischemia and no obstructive coronary arteries (INOCA): A narrative review.Atherosclerosis · 2022Review
- Type 2 MI and Myocardial Injury in the Era of High-sensitivity Troponin.European cardiology · 2022Review
- Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA).Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- 2020 APHRS/HRS expert consensus statement on the investigation of decedents with sudden unexplained death and patients with sudden cardiac arrest, and of their families.Journal of arrhythmia · 2021Article
- Myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome with non-obstructive coronary arteries and sudden cardiac death: a missing connection.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2020Review
- Autonomic neurocardiogenic syndrome is stonewalled by the universal definition of myocardial infarction.World journal of cardiology · 2020Review
- Extreme ST-segment elevations in seemingly no significant angiographic coronary artery abnormalities: a case report.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2019Article
- Why names matter for women: MINOCA/INOCA (myocardial infarction/ischemia and no obstructive coronary artery disease).Clinical cardiology · 2018Review
- Atrial and ventricular arrhythmia predictors with electrocardiographic parameters in myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease (MINOCA).Cardiovascular journal of AfricaArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo assess the arrhythmic determinants and prognosis of patients presenting with myocardial infarction and non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) with normal ejection fraction (EF).
methodsThis is an observational analysis of 131 MINOCA patients with normal EF. Three cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) diagnosis classes were recognized according to the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) pattern: Myocardial infarction (MI) (
resultsVentricular arrhythmia was observed in 18 (13.8%) patients during hospitalization. The "no LGE" patients experienced fewer ventricular events than the MI and myocarditis patients [4.0%
conclusionMINOCA patients with normal EF presented no 1-year cardiovascular events, irrespective of the CMR diagnosis class. LGE transmural extent and ST segment elevation at admission are risk markers of ventricular arrhythmia during hospitalization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.