Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28400855›Full record

ArticlePlant methods2017

Ex vitro hairy root induction in detached peanut leaves for plant-nematode interaction studies.

Larissa Arrais Guimaraes, Bruna Medeiros Pereira, Ana Claudia Guerra Araujo, Patricia Messenberg Guimaraes, Ana Cristina Miranda Brasileiro

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant methods, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Improved rapid and efficient hairy root transformation usingPlant biotechnology (Tokyo, Japan) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. A protocol for the generation ofApplications in plant sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larissa Arrais GuimaraesParque Estação Biológica, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, CP 02372, Final W5 Norte, Brasília, DF Brazil.
Bruna Medeiros PereiraParque Estação Biológica, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, CP 02372, Final W5 Norte, Brasília, DF Brazil.
Ana Claudia Guerra AraujoParque Estação Biológica, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, CP 02372, Final W5 Norte, Brasília, DF Brazil.
Patricia Messenberg GuimaraesParque Estação Biológica, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, CP 02372, Final W5 Norte, Brasília, DF Brazil.
Ana Cristina Miranda BrasileiroParque Estação Biológica, Embrapa Recursos Genéticos e Biotecnologia, CP 02372, Final W5 Norte, Brasília, DF Brazil.
Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeanut (

resultsThe present report describes an ex vitro methodology for hairy root induction in detached leaves based on the well-known ability of peanut to produce roots spontaneously from its petiole, which can be maintained for extended periods under high-humidity conditions. Thirty days after infection with the

conclusionsThis methodology proved to be more practical and cost-effective for functional validation of peanut candidate genes than in vitro and composite plant approaches, as it requires less space, reduces analysis costs and displays high transformation efficiency. The reduction in the number of RKN galls and egg masses in peanut hairy roots overexpressing

Indexed as

Agrobacterium rhizogenesArachisExpansin like-BGenetic transformationMeloidogyne

Identifiers

PMID28400855
PMCPMC5387216
OpenAlexW2606334993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.