Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399922›Full record

ArticleBMC medical ethics2017

The elusive ideal of inclusiveness: lessons from a worldwide survey of neurologists on the ethical issues raised by whole-genome sequencing.

Thierry Hurlimann, Iris Jaitovich Groisman, Béatrice Godard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical ethics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Thierry HurlimannInstitut de recherche en santé publique (IRSPUM), Omics-Ethics Research Group, University of Montreal, PO Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3 J7, Canada.
Iris Jaitovich GroismanInstitut de recherche en santé publique (IRSPUM), Omics-Ethics Research Group, University of Montreal, PO Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3 J7, Canada.
Béatrice GodardInstitut de recherche en santé publique (IRSPUM), Omics-Ethics Research Group, University of Montreal, PO Box 6128, Station Centre-ville, Montreal, QC, H3C 3 J7, Canada. beatrice.godard@umontreal.ca.ORCID 0000-0003-1980-7755

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The anticipation of ethical issues that may arise with the clinical use of genomic technologies is crucial to envision their future implementation in a manner sensitive to local contexts. Yet, populations in low- and middle-income countries are underrepresented in studies that aim to explore stakeholders' perspectives on the use of such technologies. Within the framework of a research project entitled "Personalized medicine in the treatment of epilepsy", we sought to increase inclusiveness by widening the reach of our survey, inviting neurologists from around the world to share their views and practices regarding the use of whole-genome sequencing in clinical neurology and its associated ethics. We discuss herein the compelling scientific and ethical reasons that led us to attempt to recruit neurologists worldwide, despite the lack, in many low- or middle-income countries, of access to genomic technologies. Recruitment procedures and their results are presented and discussed, as well as the barriers we faced. We conclude that inclusive recruitment remains a challenging, albeit necessary and legitimate, endeavour.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDeveloping CountriesGenomicsNeurologistsSequence Analysis, DNASocial JusticeBioethical IssuesBiomedical TechnologyDelivery of Health CareEpilepsyEthics, ResearchGenetic ResearchHumansPrecision MedicineSurveys and QuestionnairesFair inclusionGenomicsJusticeResearch ethics

Identifiers

PMID28399922
PMCPMC5389086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.