Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399913›Full record

Observational studyBMC health services research2017

The readiness and motivation interview for families (RMI-Family) managing pediatric obesity: study protocol.

Geoff D C Ball, Nicholas D Spence, Nadia E Browne, Kathleen O'Connor, Suja Srikameswaran, Joanna Zelichowska, Josephine Ho, Rebecca Gokiert, Louise C Mâsse, Valerie Carson and 8 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC health services research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03527394 (The Readiness and Motivation Interview for Families), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03527394 completednot on this map

The Readiness and Motivation Interview for Families (RMI-Family) Managing Pediatric Obesity

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of AlbertaRan2017 to 2022Enrolled54ConditionsPediatric Obesity, Motivational Interviewing
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Geoff D C BallDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada. gdball@ualberta.ca.
Nicholas D SpenceDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Nadia E BrowneDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Kathleen O'ConnorDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Suja SrikameswaranDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Joanna ZelichowskaDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Josephine HoDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Rebecca GokiertFaculty of Extension, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Louise C MâsseBC Children's Hospital Research Institute, School of Population and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Valerie CarsonFaculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Katherine M MorrisonDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.
Jennifer L KukFaculty of Health, School of Kinesiology and Health Science, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Nicholas L HoltFaculty of Physical Education and Recreation, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Maryam KebbeDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Nicole D GehringDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Melody CesarDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.
Heidi VirtanenDepartment of Pediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Josie GellerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
University of Alberta · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CAUniversity of Calgary · CABC Children's Hospital · CAMcMaster University · CAYork University · CA

Funding

CIHR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExperts recommend that clinicians assess motivational factors before initiating care for pediatric obesity. Currently, there are no well-established clinical tools available for assessing motivation in youth with obesity or their families. This represents an important gap in knowledge since motivation-related information may shed light on which patients might fail to complete treatment programs. Our study was designed to evaluate the measurement properties and utility of the Readiness and Motivational Interview for Families (RMI-Family), a structured interview that utilizes a motivational interviewing approach to (i) assess motivational factors in youth and their parents, and (ii) examine the degree to which motivation and motivation-related concordance between youth and parents are related to making changes to lifestyle habits for managing obesity in youth.

methodsFrom 2016 to 2020, this prospective study will include youth with obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥97th percentile; 13-17 years old; n = 250) and their parents (n = 250). The study will be conducted at two primary-level, multidisciplinary obesity management clinics based at children's hospitals in Alberta, Canada. Participants will be recruited and enrolled after referral to these clinics, but prior to initiating clinical care. Each youth and their parent will complete the RMI-Family (~1.5 h) at baseline, and 6- and 12-months post-baseline. Individual (i.e., youth or parent) and family-level (i.e., across youth and parent) responses to interview questions will be scored, as will aspects of interview administration (e.g., fidelity to motivational interviewing tenets). The RMI-Family will also be examined for test-retest reliability. Youth data collected at each time point will include demography, anthropometry, lifestyle habits, psychosocial functioning, and health services utilization. Cross-sectional and longitudinal associations between individual and family-level interview scores on the RMI-Family and these clinical measures will be examined. DISCUSSION: As a measurement tool drawing on family-centered care and motivational interviewing, the RMI-Family was designed to increase understanding of the role of motivational factors in pediatric obesity management, allowing healthcare providers and policymakers to manage pediatric obesity more effectively and efficiently. Findings will help to create an innovative, tailored model of health care delivery that uses resources judiciously and is designed to best meet families' needs.

Indexed as

MotivationAdolescentAlbertaAnthropometryBody Mass IndexChildChild, PreschoolCross-Sectional StudiesExerciseFemaleHumansLife StyleMaleMotivational InterviewingParentsPatient Acceptance of Health CareFamilyHealth behaviourLifestyleMotivational interviewingObesityParentPediatric

Identifiers

PMID28399913
PMCPMC5387327
OpenAlexW2605843113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.