Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399909›Full record

Trial reportTrials2017

MYPLAN -mobile phone application to manage crisis of persons at risk of suicide: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Kate Andreasson, Jesper Krogh, Per Bech, Hanne Frandsen, Niels Buus, Barbara Stanley, Ad Kerkhof, Merete Nordentoft, Annette Erlangsen

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02877316 nacompletednot on this map

MYPLAN - Effectiveness of a Safety Plan App to Manage Crisis of Persons at Risk of Suicide - a Multi-center, Superiority Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Bispebjerg and Frederiksberg HospitalRan2016 to 2022Enrolled546ConditionsSuicide Prevention, Suicidal Thoughts, Suicide AttemptsArmsMYPLAN-safety plan as an application for smart phones, safety plan on paper
NCT04414774 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Assessing the Effectiveness of a CBT-based App in Reducing Suicidal Ideation: An Open Randomized Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorShahak YarivRan2020 to 2021Enrolled128ConditionsSuicide IdeationArmsGG-Suicide-Ideation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Interventions for self-harm in children and adolescents.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. mHealth Interventions for Self-Harm: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kate AndreassonPsychiatric Centre North Zealand, University Hospital of Hillerød, Hillerød, Denmark. kate.aamund@regionh.dk.ORCID 0000-0001-7799-7513
Jesper KroghMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Per BechPsychiatric Centre North Zealand, University Hospital of Hillerød, Hillerød, Denmark.
Hanne FrandsenMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Niels BuusFaculty of Nursing and Midwifery, University of Sydney, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney & St. Vincent Private Hospital Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Barbara StanleyColumbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons and New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York, NY, USA.
Ad KerkhofDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Vrije University, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Merete NordentoftMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Annette ErlangsenMental Health Centre Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPersons with a past episode of self-harm or severe suicidal ideation are at elevated risk of self-harm as well as dying by suicide. It is well established that suicidal ideation fluctuates over time. Previous studies have shown that a personal safety plan can assist in providing support, when a person experiences suicide ideation, and help seeking professional assistance if needed. The aim of the trial is to determine whether a newly developed safety mobile app is more effective in reducing suicide ideation and other symptoms, compared to a safety plan on paper. METHODS/

designThe trial is designed as a two-arm, observer-blinded, parallel-group randomized clinical superiority trial, where participants will either receive: (1) Experimental intervention: the safety plan provided as the app MyPlan, or (2) Treatment as Usual: the safety plan in the original paper format. Based on a power calculation, a total of 546 participants, 273 in each arm will be included. They will be recruited from Danish Suicide Prevention Clinics. Both groups will receive standard psychosocial therapeutic care, up to 8-10 sessions of supportive psychotherapy. Primary outcome will be reduction in suicide ideation after 12 months. Follow-up interviews will be conducted at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after date of inclusion. DISCUSSION: A safety plan is a mandatory part of the treatment in the Suicide Prevention Clinics in Demark. There are no studies investigating the effectiveness of a safety plan app compared to a safety plan on paper on reducing suicide ideation in patients with suicide ideation and suicidal behavior. The trial will gain new knowledge of whether modern technology can augment the effects of traditional personalized safety planning.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02877316 . Registered on 19 August 2016.

Indexed as

Clinical ProtocolsMobile ApplicationsSuicide PreventionHumansPsychotherapyResearch DesignRiskSuicidal IdeationRCTSafety planSuicide behaviorSuicide ideationSuicide prevention

Identifiers

PMID28399909
PMCPMC5387214

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.