Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399907›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2017

What do register-based studies tell us about migrant mental health? A scoping review.

Kishan Patel, Anne Kouvonen, Ciara Close, Ari Väänänen, Dermot O'Reilly, Michael Donnelly

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Kishan PatelAdministrative Data Research Centre (Northern Ireland), Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK. kpatel05@qub.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-5693-6831
Anne KouvonenAdministrative Data Research Centre (Northern Ireland), Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Ciara CloseAdministrative Data Research Centre (Northern Ireland), Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Ari VäänänenFinnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland.
Dermot O'ReillyAdministrative Data Research Centre (Northern Ireland), Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Michael DonnellyAdministrative Data Research Centre (Northern Ireland), Centre for Public Health, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
Queen's University Belfast · GBFinnish Institute of Occupational Health · FI

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/K023241/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrevious studies investigating the mental health of migrants have shown mixed results. The increased availability of register data has led to a growing number of register-based studies in this research area. This is the first scoping review on the use of registry and record-linkage data to examine the mental health of migrant populations. The aim of this scoping review is to investigate the topics covered and to assess the results yielded from these studies.

methodsWe used a scoping review methodology to search MedLine, PubMed, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and SCOPUS for all register-based studies on the mental health of migrants. Two reviewers screened all papers, independently, using iteratively applied inclusion and exclusion criteria. Using gradually broadening inclusion and exclusion criteria for maximum "scope," newly published criteria developed to appraise the methodological quality of record-linkage studies were applied to eligible papers and data were extracted in a charting exercise.

resultsA total of 1309 papers were screened and appraised, 51 of which met the eligibility and quality criteria and were included in the review. This review identified four major domains of register-based research within the topic of migrant mental health: rates and risks of psychiatric disorders, rates and risks of suicide mortality, the use of psychotropic drugs, and health service utilisation and mental health-related hospitalisation rates. We found that whilst migrants can be at an increased risk of developing psychotic disorders and suicide mortality, they are less likely to use psychotropic medication and mental health-related services.

conclusionsThis review systematically charts the register-based studies on migrants' mental health for the first time. It shows the main topics and gaps in knowledge in this research domain, discusses the disadvantages of register-based studies, and suggests new directions for forthcoming studies.

Indexed as

Mental HealthRegistriesHumansMental DisordersMental Health ServicesTransients and MigrantsImmigrantsMental healthMigrantsMigrationRecord-linkageRegister dataScoping review

Identifiers

PMID28399907
PMCPMC5387245
OpenAlexW2606997373

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.