Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399903›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2017

Overexpression of syndecan-1, MUC-1, and putative stem cell markers in breast cancer leptomeningeal metastasis: a cerebrospinal fluid flow cytometry study.

Iole Cordone, Serena Masi, Valentina Summa, Mariantonia Carosi, Antonello Vidiri, Alessandra Fabi, Alessia Pasquale, Laura Conti, Immacolata Rosito, Carmine Maria Carapella and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. SDC1 is a critical transmembrane proteoglycan in breast cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. The path to leptomeningeal metastasis.Nature reviews. Cancer · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Iole CordoneRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Clinical Pathology Division, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy. iole.cordone@ifo.gov.it.ORCID 0000-0003-2797-8490
Serena MasiRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Clinical Pathology Division, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Valentina SummaRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Clinical Pathology Division, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Mariantonia CarosiRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Histopathology Department, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Antonello VidiriRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Radiology Department, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Alessandra FabiRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Medical Oncology Department, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Alessia PasqualeRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Clinical Pathology Division, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Laura ContiRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Clinical Pathology Division, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Immacolata RositoRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Clinical Pathology Division, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Carmine Maria CarapellaRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Neuro-Surgery Department, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Veronica VillaniRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Neuro-Oncology Division, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
Andrea PaceRegina Elena National Cancer Institute, Neuro-Oncology Division, Via Elio Chianesi 53, 00144, Rome, Italy.
National Cancer Institute · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCancer is a mosaic of tumor cell subpopulations, where only a minority is responsible for disease recurrence and cancer invasiveness. We focused on one of the most aggressive circulating tumor cells (CTCs) which, from the primitive tumor, spreads to the central nervous system (CNS), evaluating the expression of prognostic and putative cancer stem cell markers in breast cancer (BC) leptomeningeal metastasis (LM).

methodsFlow cytometry immunophenotypic analysis of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples (4.5 ml) was performed in 13 consecutive cases of BCLM. Syndecan-1 (CD138), MUC-1 (CD227) CD45, CD34, and the putative cancer stem cell markers CD15, CD24, CD44, and CD133 surface expression were evaluated on CSF floating tumor cells. The tumor-associated leukocyte population was also characterized.

resultsDespite a low absolute cell number (8 cell/μl, range 1-86), the flow cytometry characterization was successfully conducted in all the samples. Syndecan-1 and MUC-1 overexpression was documented on BC cells in all the samples analyzed; CD44, CD24, CD15, and CD133 in 77%, 75%, 70%, and 45% of cases, respectively. A strong syndecan-1 and MUC-1 expression was also documented by immunohistochemistry on primary breast cancer tissues, performed in four patients. The CSF tumor population was flanked by T lymphocytes, with a different immunophenotype between the CSF and peripheral blood samples (P ≤ 0.02).

conclusionsFlow cytometry can be successfully employed for solid tumor LM characterization even in CSF samples with low cell count. This in vivo study documents that CSF floating BC cells overexpress prognostic and putative cancer stem cell biomarkers related to tumor invasiveness, potentially representing a molecular target for circulating tumor cell detection and LM treatment monitoring, as well as a primary target for innovative treatment strategies. The T lymphocyte infiltration, documented in all CSF samples, suggests a possible involvement of the CNS lymphatic system in both lymphoid and cancer cell migration into and out of the meninges, supporting the extension of a new form of cellular immunotherapy to LM. Due to the small number of cases, validation on large cohorts of patients are warranted to confirm these findings and to evaluate the impact and value of these results for diagnosis and management of LM.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsCell CountCerebrospinal FluidFemaleFlow CytometryHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunophenotypingLeukocytesMeningeal NeoplasmsMiddle AgedMucin-1Neoplasm StagingBiomarkers, TumorMUC1 protein, humanMucin-1Syndecan-1Breast cancerCancer stem cellCirculating tumor cellsFlow cytometryLeptomeningeal metastasisPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID28399903
PMCPMC5387324
OpenAlexW2606837559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.