Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399794›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2017

Meta-analysis approach as a gene selection method in class prediction: does it improve model performance? A case study in acute myeloid leukemia.

Putri W Novianti, Victor L Jong, Kit C B Roes, Marinus J C Eijkemans

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Putri W NoviantiBiostatistics & Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands. p.novianti@vumc.nl.
Victor L JongBiostatistics & Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Kit C B RoesBiostatistics & Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marinus J C EijkemansBiostatistics & Research Support, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3508, GA, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAggregating gene expression data across experiments via meta-analysis is expected to increase the precision of the effect estimates and to increase the statistical power to detect a certain fold change. This study evaluates the potential benefit of using a meta-analysis approach as a gene selection method prior to predictive modeling in gene expression data.

resultsSix raw datasets from different gene expression experiments in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 11 different classification methods were used to build classification models to classify samples as either AML or healthy control. First, the classification models were trained on gene expression data from single experiments using conventional supervised variable selection and externally validated with the other five gene expression datasets (referred to as the individual-classification approach). Next, gene selection was performed through meta-analysis on four datasets, and predictive models were trained with the selected genes on the fifth dataset and validated on the sixth dataset. For some datasets, gene selection through meta-analysis helped classification models to achieve higher performance as compared to predictive modeling based on a single dataset; but for others, there was no major improvement. Synthetic datasets were generated from nine simulation scenarios. The effect of sample size, fold change and pairwise correlation between differentially expressed (DE) genes on the difference between MA- and individual-classification model was evaluated. The fold change and pairwise correlation significantly contributed to the difference in performance between the two methods. The gene selection via meta-analysis approach was more effective when it was conducted using a set of data with low fold change and high pairwise correlation on the DE genes.

conclusionGene selection through meta-analysis on previously published studies potentially improves the performance of a predictive model on a given gene expression data.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticModels, GeneticGene Expression ProfilingGenes, NeoplasmHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteAcute myeloid leukemiaGene expressionMeta-analysisPredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID28399794
PMCPMC5387259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.