Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399571›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2017

Testing for Gene-Environment Interactions Using a Prospective Family Cohort Design: Body Mass Index in Early and Later Adulthood and Risk of Breast Cancer.

Gillian S Dite, Robert J MacInnis, Adrian Bickerstaffe, James G Dowty, Roger L Milne, Antonis C Antoniou, Prue Weideman, Carmel Apicella, Graham G Giles, Melissa C Southey and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Impact of Gene-Environment Interactions on Cancer Development.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Gillian S Dite
Robert J MacInnis
Adrian Bickerstaffe
James G Dowty
Roger L Milne
Antonis C Antoniou
Prue Weideman
Carmel Apicella
Graham G Giles
Melissa C Southey
Mark A Jenkins
Kelly-Anne Phillips
Aung Ko Win
Mary Beth Terry
John L Hopper

Funding

Northern California Cooperative Family Registry for Breast CancerU01CA069417 · NCI · NORTHERN CALIFORNIA CANCER CENTER · PI JOHN, ESTHER M. · 1995 to 2010
$22.4M
Breast Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA164920 · NCI · CANCER PREVENTION INSTIT OF CALIFORNIA · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE, BUYS, SAUNDRA S · 2012 to 2017
$12.7M
Colon Cancer Family Registry CohortUM1CA167551 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI HAILE, ROBERT WILLIAM, JENKINS, MARK A · 2013 to 2017
$11.3M
METROPOLITAN NEW YORK REGISTRY OF BREAST CANCER FAMILIESU01CA069398 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI TERRY, MARY BETH · 1995 to 2010
$10.5M
ONTARIO REGISTRY FOR STUDIES OF FAMILIAL BREAST CANCERU01CA069467 · NCI · CANCER CARE ONTARIO · PI ANDRULIS, IRENE L. · 1995 to 2010
$10.4M
Philadelphia Breast Cancer Family RegistryU01CA069631 · NCI · FOX CHASE CANCER CENTER · PI DALY, MARY BERYL · 1995 to 2010
$7.4M
AUSTRALASIAN COLORECTAL CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2002 to 2007
$6.9M
THE AUSTRALIAN BREAST CANCER FAMILY REGISTRYU01CA069638 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 1995 to 2010
$6.6M
The Colon Cancer Family Registry: AustralasiaU24CA097735 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE · PI HOPPER, JOHN L · 2008 to 2011
$6.2M
Utah Breast Cancer Family RegistryU01CA069446 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BUYS, SAUNDRA S · 1995 to 2010
$4.6M
Cancer Research UK 20861NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069398NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069417NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069446NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069467NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069631NCI NIH HHS U01 CA069638NCI NIH HHS U01 CA097735NCI NIH HHS U24 CA097735NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA164920NCI NIH HHS UM1 CA167551
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to classify people according to their underlying genetic susceptibility to a disease is increasing with new knowledge, better family data, and more sophisticated risk prediction models, allowing for more effective prevention and screening. To do so, however, we need to know whether risk associations are the same for people with different genetic susceptibilities. To illustrate one way to estimate such gene-environment interactions, we used prospective data from 3 Australian family cancer cohort studies, 2 enriched for familial risk of breast cancer. There were 288 incident breast cancers in 9,126 participants from 3,222 families. We used Cox proportional hazards models to investigate whether associations of breast cancer with body mass index (BMI; weight (kg)/height (m)2) at age 18-21 years, BMI at baseline, and change in BMI differed according to genetic risk based on lifetime breast cancer risk from birth, as estimated by BOADICEA (Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm) software, adjusted for age at baseline data collection. Although no interactions were statistically significant, we have demonstrated the power with which gene-environment interactions can be investigated using a cohort enriched for persons with increased genetic risk and a continuous measure of genetic risk based on family history.

Indexed as

Body Mass IndexGene-Environment InteractionGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseReproductive HistoryAdolescentAdultAustraliaBreast NeoplasmsFamily HealthFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMiddle AgedNew ZealandProportional Hazards ModelsProspective StudiesBOADICEAbody mass indexbreast cancercohort studiesfamilial riskfamily studiesgene-environment interaction

Identifiers

PMID28399571
PMCPMC6158796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.