Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399329›Full record

ArticleJournal of evaluation in clinical practice2017

Adapting a large database of point of care summarized guidelines: a process description.

Nicolas Delvaux, Stijn Van de Velde, Bert Aertgeerts, Martine Goossens, Benjamin Fauquert, Ilka Kunnamo, Paul Van Royen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of evaluation in clinical practice, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Barriers and facilitators to clinical information seeking: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Strengthening prehospital clinical practice guideline development in South Africa: Reflections from guideline experts.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2021
    Article
  5. Guidance we can trust? The status and quality of prehospital clinical guidance in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review.African journal of emergency medicine : Revue africaine de la medecine d'urgence · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nicolas DelvauxAcademic Centre for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Stijn Van de VeldeEBMPracticeNet, Leuven, Belgium.
Bert AertgeertsAcademic Centre for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Martine GoossensAcademic Centre for General Practice, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Benjamin FauquertEBMPracticeNet, Leuven, Belgium.
Ilka KunnamoDuodecim, Helsinki, Finland.
Paul Van RoyenBelgian Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBAM), Leuven, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

RATIONALE, AIMS AND

objectivesQuestions posed at the point of care (POC) can be answered using POC summarized guidelines. To implement a national POC information resource, we subscribed to a large database of POC summarized guidelines to complement locally available guidelines. Our challenge was in developing a sustainable strategy for adapting almost 1000 summarized guidelines. The aim of this paper was to describe our process for adapting a database of POC summarized guidelines.

methodsAn adaptation process based on the ADAPTE framework was tailored to be used by a heterogeneous group of participants. Guidelines were assessed on content and on applicability to the Belgian context. To improve efficiency, we chose to first aim our efforts towards those guidelines most important to primary care doctors.

resultsOver a period of 3 years, we screened about 80% of 1000 international summarized guidelines. For those guidelines identified as most important for primary care doctors, we noted that in about half of the cases, remarks were made concerning content. On the other hand, at least two-thirds of all screened guidelines required no changes when evaluating their local usability.

conclusionsAdapting a large body of POC summarized guidelines using a formal adaptation process is possible, even when faced with limited resources. This can be done by creating an efficient and collaborative effort and ensuring user-friendly procedures. Our experiences show that even though in most cases guidelines can be adopted without adaptations, careful review of guidelines developed in a different context remains necessary. Streamlining international efforts in adapting international POC information resources and adopting similar adaptation processes may lessen duplication efforts and prove more cost-effective.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicBelgiumDatabases, FactualEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPoint-of-Care Systemsevidence‐based medicineknowledge basespoint‐of‐care systemspractice guidelines as topic

Identifiers

PMID28399329
PMCPMC5347856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.