Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399267›Full record

ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2017

Development of a Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol Amino Acid-Dicarboxylate Prodrug With Improved Ocular Bioavailability.

Goutham R Adelli, Prakash Bhagav, Pranjal Taskar, Tushar Hingorani, Sara Pettaway, Waseem Gul, Mahmoud A ElSohly, Michael A Repka, Soumyajit Majumdar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. LC-MS/MS quantitation of non-psychotropic cannabinoid cannabidiol in aqueous humor.Journal of pharmaceutical and biomedical analysis · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. ΔTranslational vision science & technology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Goutham R AdelliDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States.
Prakash BhagavDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States.
Pranjal TaskarDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States.
Tushar HingoraniDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States.
Sara PettawayDepartment of Biomolecular Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States.
Waseem GulElSohly Laboratories, Inc., Oxford, Mississippi, United States.
Mahmoud A ElSohlyDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States 3ElSohly Laboratories, Inc., Oxford, Mississippi, United States.
Michael A RepkaDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States 4Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States.
Soumyajit MajumdarDepartment of Pharmaceutics and Drug Delivery, School of Pharmacy, University of Mississippi, University, Mississippi, United States.
University of Mississippi · USElSohly Laboratories (United States) · US

Funding

Center of Research Excellence in Natural Products Neuroscience (CORE-NPN)P20GM104932 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MISSISSIPPI · PI MAJUMDAR, SOUMYAJIT · 2012 to 2016
$10.0M
Development of Tetrahydrocannabinol Prodrugs for Topical Treatment of GlaucomaR41EY020042 · NEI · ELSOHLY LABORATORIES, INC. · PI ELSOHLY, MAHMOUD A · 2011 to 2011
$167k
NEI NIH HHS R41 EY020042NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104932
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the utility of the relatively hydrophilic Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) prodrugs, mono and di-valine esters (THC-Val and THC-Val-Val) and the amino acid (valine)-dicarboxylic acid (hemisuccinate) ester (THC-Val-HS), with respect to ocular penetration and intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering activity. THC, timolol, and pilocarpine eye drops were used as controls. Methods: THC-Val, THC-Val-Val, and THC-Val-HS were synthesized and chemically characterized. Aqueous solubility and in vitro transcorneal permeability of THC and the prodrugs, in the presence of various surfactants and cyclodextrins, were determined. Two formulations were evaluated for therapeutic activity in the α-chymotrypsin induced rabbit glaucoma model, and the results were compared against controls comprising of THC emulsion and marketed timolol maleate and pilocarpine eye drops. Results: THC-Val-HS demonstrated markedly improved solubility (96-fold) and in vitro permeability compared to THC. Selected formulations containing THC-Val-HS effectively delivered THC to the anterior segment ocular tissues in the anesthetized rabbits: 62.1 ng/100 μL of aqueous humor (AH) and 51.4 ng/50 mg of iris ciliary bodies (IC) (total THC). The duration and extent of IOP lowering induced by THC-Val-HS was 1 hour longer and 10% greater, respectively, than that obtained with THC and was comparable with the pilocarpine eye drops. Timolol ophthalmic drops, however, exhibited a longer duration of activity. Both THC and THC-Val-HS were detected in the ocular tissues following multiple dosing of THC-Val-HS in conscious animals. The concentration of THC in the iris-ciliary bodies at the 60- and 120-minute time points (53 and 57.4 ng/50 mg) were significantly greater than that of THC-Val-HS (24.2 and 11.3 ng/50 mg). Moreover, at the two time points studied, the concentration of THC was observed to increase or stay relatively constant, whereas THC-Val-HS concentration decreased by at least 50%. A similar trend was observed in the retina-choroid tissues. Conclusions: A combination of prodrug derivatization and formulation development approaches significantly improved the penetration of THC into the anterior segment of the eye following topical application. Enhanced ocular penetration resulted in significantly improved IOP-lowering activity.

Indexed as

AnimalsAqueous HumorBiological AvailabilityCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsCorneaDisease Models, AnimalDronabinolDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGlaucomaIntraocular PressureMaleOphthalmic SolutionsProdrugsRabbitsVitreous BodyCannabinoid Receptor AgonistsDronabinolOphthalmic SolutionsProdrugs

Identifiers

PMID28399267
PMCPMC5389743
OpenAlexW2607395334

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.