Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399124›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

Dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays for detecting Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium avium complexes and related pathogens in cultures.

Jyotsna Shah, Helena Weltman, Patricia Narciso, Christina Murphy, Akhila Poruri, Shrikala Baliga, Leesha Sharon, Mary York, Gail Cunningham, Steve Miller and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. sRNA-FISH: versatile fluorescent in situ detection of small RNAs in plants.The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Diseases and Molecular Diagnostics: A Step Closer to Precision Medicine.Indian journal of clinical biochemistry : IJCB · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Jyotsna ShahID-FISH Technology Inc., Palo Alto, California, United States of America.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9890-366X
Helena WeltmanID-FISH Technology Inc., Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Patricia NarcisoID-FISH Technology Inc., Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Christina MurphyID-FISH Technology Inc., Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Akhila PoruriID-FISH Technology Inc., Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Shrikala BaligaKasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal University, India.
Leesha SharonKasturba Medical College, Mangalore, Manipal University, India.
Mary YorkID-FISH Technology Inc., Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
Gail CunninghamUniversity of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Steve MillerUniversity of California, San Francisco, California, United States of America.
Luz CaviedesLabotorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Iquitos, Peru.
Robert GilmanLabotorio de Investigación en Enfermedades Infecciosas of the Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Iquitos, Peru.
Edward DesmondMicrobial Disease Laboratory, California Department of Public Health, Richmond, California, United States of America.
Ranjan RamasamyID-FISH Technology Inc., Palo Alto, California, United States of America.
ID-FISH Technology (United States) · USManipal Academy of Higher Education · INUniversidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia · PEUniversity of California, San Francisco · USCalifornia Department of Public Health · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two rapid dual color fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays were evaluated for detecting M. tuberculosis and related pathogens in cultures. The MN Genus-MTBC FISH assay uses an orange fluorescent probe specific for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTBC) and a green fluorescent probe specific for the Mycobacterium and Nocardia genera (MN Genus) to detect and distinguish MTBC from other Mycobacteria and Nocardia. A complementary MTBC-MAC FISH assay uses green and orange fluorescent probes specific for the MTBC and M. avium complex (MAC) respectively to identify and differentiate the two species complexes. The assays are performed on acid-fast staining bacteria from liquid or solid cultures in less than two hours. Forty-three of 44 reference mycobacterial isolates were correctly identified by the MN Genus-specific probe as Mycobacterium species, with six of these correctly identified as MTBC with the MTBC-specific probe and 14 correctly as MAC by the MAC-specific probe. Of the 25 reference isolates of clinically relevant pathogens of other genera tested, only four isolates representing two species of Corynebacterium gave a positive signal with the MN Genus probe. None of these 25 isolates were detected by the MTBC and MAC specific probes. A total of 248 cultures of clinical mycobacterial isolates originating in India, Peru and the USA were also tested by FISH assays. DNA sequence of a part of the 23S ribosomal RNA gene amplified by PCR was obtained from 243 of the 248 clinical isolates. All 243 were confirmed by DNA sequencing as Mycobacterium species, with 157 and 50 of these identified as belonging to the MTBC and the MAC, respectively. The accuracy of the MN Genus-, MTBC-and MAC -specific probes in identifying these 243 cultures in relation to their DNA sequence-based identification was 100%. All ten isolates of Nocardia, (three reference strains and seven clinical isolates) tested were detected by the MN Genus-specific probe but not the MTBC- or MAC-specific probes. The limit of detection for M. tuberculosis was determined to be 5.1x104 cfu per ml and for M. avium 1.5x104 cfu per ml in liquid cultures with the respective MTBC- and MAC-specific probes in both the MN Genus-MTBC and MTBC-MAC FISH assays. The only specialized equipment needed for the FISH assays is a standard light microscope fitted with a LED light source and appropriate filters. The two FISH assays meet an important diagnostic need in peripheral laboratories of resource-limited tuberculosis-endemic countries.

Indexed as

In Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceBacillus subtilisCorynebacteriumFluorescent DyesGenes, rRNAMicroscopy, FluorescenceMycobacterium avium ComplexMycobacterium tuberculosisNocardiaRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23SSensitivity and SpecificityFluorescent DyesRNA, Ribosomal, 16SRNA, Ribosomal, 23S

Identifiers

PMID28399124
PMCPMC5388335
OpenAlexW2607439261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.