Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399123›Full record

ArticlePloS one2017

The distinct plastid genome structure of Maackia fauriei (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae) and its systematic implications for genistoids and tribe Sophoreae.

In-Su Choi, Byoung-Hee Choi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Polyphyly ofFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Comparative Chloroplast Genomics ofFrontiers in plant science · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The complete plastid genome ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

In-Su ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.
Byoung-Hee ChoiDepartment of Biological Sciences, Inha University, Incheon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-9052
Inha University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditionally, the tribe Sophoreae sensu lato has been considered a basal but also heterogeneous taxonomic group of the papilionoid legumes. Phylogenetic studies have placed Sophoreae sensu stricto (s.s.) as a member of the core genistoids. The recently suggested new circumscription of this tribe involved the removal of traditional members and the inclusion of Euchresteae and Thermopsideae. Nonetheless, definitions and inter- and intra-taxonomic issues of Sophoreae remain unclear. Within the field of legume systematics, the molecular characteristics of a plastid genome (plastome) have an important role in helping to define taxonomic groups. Here, we examined the plastome of Maackia fauriei, belonging to Sophoreae s.s., to elucidate the molecular characteristics of Sophoreae. Its gene contents are similar to the plastomes of other typical legumes. Putative pseudogene rps16 of Maackia and Lupinus species imply independent functional gene loss from the genistoids. Our overall examination of that loss among legumes suggests that it is common among all major clades of Papilionoideae. The M. fauriei plastome has a novel 24-kb inversion in its large single copy region, as well as previously recognized 50-kb and 36-kb inversions. The 36-kb inversion is shared by the core genistoids. The 24-kb inversion is present in the eight genera belonging to three tribes: Euchresteae, Sophoreae s.s., and Thermopsideae. The phylogenetic distribution of this 24-kb inversion strongly supports the monophyly of members of Sophoreae s.s. with Euchresteae and Thermopsideae. Hence, it can be used as a putative synapomorphic characteristic for the newly circumscribed Sophoreae, including Euchresteae and Thermopsideae. However, plastome conformation suggests a slightly narrower taxonomic group because of heterogeneous results from Bolusanthus and Dicraeopetalum. The phylogenetic analysis, based on plastome sequences from 43 legumes, represents well our understanding of legume systematics while resolving the genistoid clade as a sister group to an Old World clade. It also demonstrates the value that plastomes are powerful marker for systematic studies of basal papilionoid legumes.

Indexed as

Genome, PlastidGenetic VariationMaackiaPhylogenyPlastidsSequence Homology, Nucleic Acid

Identifiers

PMID28399123
PMCPMC5388331
OpenAlexW2606836609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.