Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28399064›Full record

ReviewEar and hearing

Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Ryan A Stevenson, Sterling W Sheffield, Iliza M Butera, René H Gifford, Mark T Wallace

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. The rhythm of sensory input shapes audio-visual temporal processing.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient-Led Research to Develop a Training Programme for Restoring Musical Joy in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Reflexive Process Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Crossmodal interactions in human learning and memory.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  19. Multisensory and lexical information in speech perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ryan A Stevenson1Department of Psychology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; 2Brain and Mind Institute, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada; 3Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Audiology and Speech Pathology Center, London, Ontario, Canada; 4Vanderbilt Brain Institute, Nashville, Tennesse; 5Vanderbilt Kennedy Center, Nashville, Tennesse; 6Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennesse; 7Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennesse; and 8Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennesse.
Sterling W Sheffield
Iliza M Butera
René H Gifford
Mark T Wallace
John F. Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts · USNational Defence Medical Centre · CAVanderbilt Health · USWestern University · CA

Funding

Training in Fundamental NeuroscienceT32MH064913 · NIMH · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI IHRIE, REBECCA A, WINDER, DANNY G. · 2001 to 2022
$7.6M
Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Development of Multisensory Cortex: Role of ExperienceR01MH063861 · NIMH · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI WALLACE, MARK THOMAS · 2002 to 2012
$3.8M
Multisensory Processing Across Lifespan and Links to CognitionR21CA183492 · NCI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI NEWHOUSE, PAUL A., WALLACE, MARK THOMAS · 2013 to 2014
$416k
Multisensory Integration and Temporal processing in AutismF32DC011993 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI STEVENSON, RYAN ANDREW · 2011 to 2013
$92k
Individual differences in cochlear implant users' audiovisual integration and links to speech proficiencyF31DC015956 · NIDCD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BUTERA, ILIZA MYERS · 2016 to 2018
$86k
CIHRNCI NIH HHS R21 CA183492NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIDCD NIH HHS F31 DC015956NIDCD NIH HHS F32 DC011993NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH063861NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH064913
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Speech perception is inherently a multisensory process involving integration of auditory and visual cues. Multisensory integration in cochlear implant (CI) recipients is a unique circumstance in that the integration occurs after auditory deprivation and the provision of hearing via the CI. Despite the clear importance of multisensory cues for perception, in general, and for speech intelligibility, specifically, the topic of multisensory perceptual benefits in CI users has only recently begun to emerge as an area of inquiry. We review the research that has been conducted on multisensory integration in CI users to date and suggest a number of areas needing further research. The overall pattern of results indicates that many CI recipients show at least some perceptual gain that can be attributable to multisensory integration. The extent of this gain, however, varies based on a number of factors, including age of implantation and specific task being assessed (e.g., stimulus detection, phoneme perception, word recognition). Although both children and adults with CIs obtain audiovisual benefits for phoneme, word, and sentence stimuli, neither group shows demonstrable gain for suprasegmental feature perception. Additionally, only early-implanted children and the highest performing adults obtain audiovisual integration benefits similar to individuals with normal hearing. Increasing age of implantation in children is associated with poorer gains resultant from audiovisual integration, suggesting a sensitive period in development for the brain networks that subserve these integrative functions, as well as length of auditory experience. This finding highlights the need for early detection of and intervention for hearing loss, not only in terms of auditory perception, but also in terms of the behavioral and perceptual benefits of audiovisual processing. Importantly, patterns of auditory, visual, and audiovisual responses suggest that underlying integrative processes may be fundamentally different between CI users and typical-hearing listeners. Future research, particularly in low-level processing tasks such as signal detection will help to further assess mechanisms of multisensory integration for individuals with hearing loss, both with and without CIs.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsAdultAuditory PerceptionChildHumansReaction TimeVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID28399064
PMCPMC5570631
OpenAlexW2606029086

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.