ReviewEar and hearing
Multisensory Integration in Cochlear Implant Recipients.
Review in Ear and hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of multisensory simultaneity judgment training on the comprehension and cortical processing of speech in noise: a randomized controlled trial.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Audiovisual Speech Recognition in Adult Cochlear Implant Candidates: Relations with Cognitive-Linguistic Abilities.Otology & neurotology open · 2026Article
- The rhythm of sensory input shapes audio-visual temporal processing.British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953) · 2026Article
- Impact of visual mouth image presentation on speech perception in noise in normal hearing subjects and cochlear implant users.PloS one · 2026Article
- Linking brain activation to clinical outcomes: an fNIRS study in cochlear implant users and normal hearing individuals.Neurophotonics · 2026Article
- Multisensory assessment for hearing phenotypes.Hearing research · 2025Article
- Article
- Effect of hearing experience on preschool-aged children's eye gaze to a talker during spoken language processing.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2025Article
- Audiovisual simultaneity windows reflect temporal sensory uncertainty.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2024Article
- Patient-Led Research to Develop a Training Programme for Restoring Musical Joy in Cochlear Implant Recipients: A Reflexive Process Evaluation.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
- The brain can develop conflicting multisensory principles to guide behavior.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Review
- Impact of ASL Exposure on Spoken Phonemic Discrimination in Adult CI Users: A Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy Study.Neurobiology of language (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- The impact of visual information in speech perception for individuals with hearing loss: a mini review.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Predictive language processing: integrating comprehension and production, and what atypical populations can tell us.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- Noise-rearing precludes the behavioral benefits of multisensory integration.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2023Article
- Cortical responses correlate with speech performance in pre-lingually deaf cochlear implant children.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Crossmodal interactions in human learning and memory.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Review
- Multisensory and lexical information in speech perception.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Multisensory integration in humans with spinal cord injury.Scientific reports · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Speech perception is inherently a multisensory process involving integration of auditory and visual cues. Multisensory integration in cochlear implant (CI) recipients is a unique circumstance in that the integration occurs after auditory deprivation and the provision of hearing via the CI. Despite the clear importance of multisensory cues for perception, in general, and for speech intelligibility, specifically, the topic of multisensory perceptual benefits in CI users has only recently begun to emerge as an area of inquiry. We review the research that has been conducted on multisensory integration in CI users to date and suggest a number of areas needing further research. The overall pattern of results indicates that many CI recipients show at least some perceptual gain that can be attributable to multisensory integration. The extent of this gain, however, varies based on a number of factors, including age of implantation and specific task being assessed (e.g., stimulus detection, phoneme perception, word recognition). Although both children and adults with CIs obtain audiovisual benefits for phoneme, word, and sentence stimuli, neither group shows demonstrable gain for suprasegmental feature perception. Additionally, only early-implanted children and the highest performing adults obtain audiovisual integration benefits similar to individuals with normal hearing. Increasing age of implantation in children is associated with poorer gains resultant from audiovisual integration, suggesting a sensitive period in development for the brain networks that subserve these integrative functions, as well as length of auditory experience. This finding highlights the need for early detection of and intervention for hearing loss, not only in terms of auditory perception, but also in terms of the behavioral and perceptual benefits of audiovisual processing. Importantly, patterns of auditory, visual, and audiovisual responses suggest that underlying integrative processes may be fundamentally different between CI users and typical-hearing listeners. Future research, particularly in low-level processing tasks such as signal detection will help to further assess mechanisms of multisensory integration for individuals with hearing loss, both with and without CIs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.