Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28398962›Full record

ArticleAnnals of surgery2017

Population-based Assessment of Intraoperative Fluid Administration Practices Across Three Surgical Specialties.

Scott E Regenbogen, Nirav J Shah, Stacey D Collins, Samantha Hendren, Michael J Englesbe, Darrell A Campbell

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Reduction in Cardiac Arrhythmias Within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program in Colorectal Surgery.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Scott E Regenbogen*Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI†Department of Anesthesia, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI‡Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI§Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI.
Nirav J Shah
Stacey D Collins
Samantha Hendren
Michael J Englesbe
Darrell A Campbell
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

"Enhanced Recovery" Protocols and the Cost and Quality of Inpatient SurgeryK08AG047252 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REGENBOGEN, SCOTT ELLIS · 2015 to 2019
$712k
Toward More Effective "Enhanced Recovery" Protocols for Major Surgery in Older AdR03AG047860 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI REGENBOGEN, SCOTT ELLIS · 2014 to 2015
$229k
NIA NIH HHS K08 AG047252NIA NIH HHS R03 AG047860
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess the variation in hospitals' approaches to intraoperative fluid management and their association with postoperative recovery.

backgroundDespite increasing interest in goal-directed, restricted-volume fluid administration for major surgery, there remains little consensus on optimal strategies, due to the lack of institution-level studies of resuscitation practices.

methodsAmong 64 hospitals in a state-wide surgical collaborative, we profiled fluid administration practices during 8404 intestinal resections, 22,854 hysterectomies, and 1471 abdominopelvic endovascular procedures. We computed intraoperative fluid balance, accounting for patient morphometry, crystalloid, colloid, blood products, urine, blood loss, duration, and approach. We stratified hospitals by average fluid balance quartile, and compared patterns across disciplines and associations with risk-adjusted postoperative length of stay (pLOS).

resultsThere was wide variation in fluid balance between hospitals (P < 0.001, all procedures), but significant within-hospital correlation across operations (Pearson rho: intestinal-hysterectomy = 0.50, intestinal-endovascular = 0.36, hysterectomy-endovascular = 0.54, all P < 0.05). Highest fluid balance hospitals had significantly longer adjusted pLOS than lowest balance hospitals for intestinal resection (6.5 vs 5.7 d, P < 0.001) and hysterectomy (1.9 vs 1.7 d, P < 0.001), but not endovascular (2.1 vs 2.3 d, P = 0.69). Risk-adjusted complication rates were not associated with fluid balance rankings.

conclusionsHospitals' approaches to intraoperative fluid administration vary widely, and their practice patterns are pervasive across disparate procedures. High fluid balance hospitals have 12% to 14% longer risk-adjusted pLOS for visceral abdominal surgery, independent of patient complexity and complications. These findings are consistent with evidence that isovolemic resuscitation in enhanced recovery protocols accelerates recovery of bowel function.

Indexed as

Quality of Health CareAdultAgedCohort StudiesColorectal SurgeryEndovascular ProceduresFemaleFluid TherapyFollow-Up StudiesHumansHysterectomyIntraoperative CareMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID28398962
PMCPMC5407414
OpenAlexW2343231909

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.