ReviewBirth defects research2017
Preparing for biological threats: Addressing the needs of pregnant women.
Review in Birth defects research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pan-cancer analysis reveals intratumoral microbial diversity in multiple cancers by amplicon technology.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Article
- CDC Division of Reproductive Health's Emergency Preparedness Resources and Activities for Radiation Emergencies: Public Health Considerations for Women's Reproductive Health.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2023Article
- Haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis due toAccess microbiology · 2023Article
- Case Report: Lyme Borreliosis and Pregnancy - Our Experience.Frontiers in medicine · 2022Article
- Emergency Preparedness and Response: Highlights from the Division of Reproductive Health, 2011-2021.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2021Article
- Case Report: Gestational Melioidosis through Perinatal Transmission.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2020Article
- Plague and Pregnancy: Why Special Considerations Are Needed.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2020Article
- Disseminated melioidosis in early pregnancy - an unproven cause of foetal loss.BMC infectious diseases · 2020Article
- Deliberate release: Plague - A review.Journal of biosafety and biosecurity · 2020Review
- Confronting the threat of bioterrorism: realities, challenges, and defensive strategies.The Lancet. Infectious diseases · 2019Review
- A surprising treatment response in a patient with rare isolated growth hormone deficiency, type IB.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism case reports · 2017Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Intentional release of infectious agents and biological weapons to cause illness and death has the potential to greatly impact pregnant women and their fetuses. We review what is known about the maternal and fetal effects of seven biological threats: Bacillus anthracis (anthrax); variola virus (smallpox); Clostridium botulinum toxin (botulism); Burkholderia mallei (glanders) and Burkholderia pseudomallei (melioidosis); Yersinia pestis (plague); Francisella tularensis (tularemia); and Rickettsia prowazekii (typhus). Evaluating the potential maternal, fetal, and infant consequences of an intentional release of an infectious agent requires an assessment of several key issues: (1) are pregnant women more susceptible to infection or illness compared to the general population?; (2) are pregnant women at increased risk for severe illness, morbidity, and mortality compared to the general population?; (3) does infection or illness during pregnancy place women, the fetus, or the infant at increased risk for adverse outcomes and how does this affect clinical management?; and (4) are the medical countermeasures recommended for the general population safe and effective during pregnancy? These issues help frame national guidance for the care of pregnant women during an intentional release of a biological threat. Birth Defects Research 109:391-398, 2017.© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.