Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28398525›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2017

A longitudinal analysis of data quality in a large pediatric data research network.

Ritu Khare, Levon Utidjian, Byron J Ruth, Michael G Kahn, Evanette Burrows, Keith Marsolo, Nandan Patibandla, Hanieh Razzaghi, Ryan Colvin, Daksha Ranade and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Electronic health record data quality assessment and tools: a systematic review.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2023
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. A data driven learning approach for the assessment of data quality.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ritu KhareDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Levon UtidjianDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Byron J RuthDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Michael G KahnDepartment of Pediatrics, University of Colorado Denver Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.
Evanette BurrowsDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Keith MarsoloUniversity of Cincinnati Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Nandan PatibandlaInformation Services Department, Children's Hospital Boston, Boston, MA, USA.
Hanieh RazzaghiDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.
Ryan ColvinDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Daksha RanadeResearch Informatics, Seattle Children's Research Institute, Seattle, WA, USA.
Melody KitzmillerResearch Information Solutions and Innovation, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH, USA.
Daniel EckrichCenter for Pediatric Auditory and Speech Sciences, Nemours Biomedical Research, Wilmington, DE, USA.
L Charles BaileyDepartment of Biomedical and Health Informatics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Funding

Better Outcomes for Children: Promoting Excellence in Healthcare Genomics to Inform PolicyU01HG008666 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI HARLEY, JOHN BARKER · 2015 to 2019
$4.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008666
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePEDSnet is a clinical data research network (CDRN) that aggregates electronic health record data from multiple children's hospitals to enable large-scale research. Assessing data quality to ensure suitability for conducting research is a key requirement in PEDSnet. This study presents a range of data quality issues identified over a period of 18 months and interprets them to evaluate the research capacity of PEDSnet. MATERIALS AND

methodsResults were generated by a semiautomated data quality assessment workflow. Two investigators reviewed programmatic data quality issues and conducted discussions with the data partners' extract-transform-load analysts to determine the cause for each issue.

resultsThe results include a longitudinal summary of 2182 data quality issues identified across 9 data submission cycles. The metadata from the most recent cycle includes annotations for 850 issues: most frequent types, including missing data (>300) and outliers (>100); most complex domains, including medications (>160) and lab measurements (>140); and primary causes, including source data characteristics (83%) and extract-transform-load errors (9%). DISCUSSION: The longitudinal findings demonstrate the network's evolution from identifying difficulties with aligning the data to a common data model to learning norms in clinical pediatrics and determining research capability.

conclusionWhile data quality is recognized as a critical aspect in establishing and utilizing a CDRN, the findings from data quality assessments are largely unpublished. This paper presents a real-world account of studying and interpreting data quality findings in a pediatric CDRN, and the lessons learned could be used by other CDRNs.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchData AccuracyHospitals, PediatricDatasets as TopicElectronic Health RecordsLongitudinal StudiesCDRNdata qualityelectronic health recordextract-transform-loadsecondary use

Identifiers

PMID28398525
PMCPMC6259665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.