Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28398523›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2017

Transitions in pregnancy planning in women recruited for a large prospective cohort study.

U Luderer, T Li, J P Fine, R F Hamman, J B Stanford, D Baker

Abstract readComparative StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

U LudererDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, USA.
T LiWestat, Rockville, MD 20850, USA.
J P FineDepartment of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA.
R F HammanDepartment of Epidemiology, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
J B StanfordDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA.
D BakerDivision of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California Irvine, Irvine, CA 92617, USA.

Funding

NATIONAL CHILDREN'S STUDY - VANGUARD CENTERN01HD53411 · NICHD · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI LANDRIGAN, PHILIP J · 2007 to 2009
$16.2M
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S STUDY - VANGUARD CENTERN01HD53410 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI CLARK, EDWARD · 2007 to 2009
$15.4M
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S STUDY VANGUARD CENTERN01HD63416 · NICHD · SOUTH DAKOTA STATE UNIVERSITY · 2007 to 2009
$13.5M
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S STUDY - VANGUARD CENTERN01HD53396 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · 2007 to 2009
$13.0M
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S STUDYN01HD53415 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · 2007 to 2009
$11.5M
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S STUDYN01HD53413 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · 2007 to 2009
$11.5M
NATIONAL CHILDREN'S STUDY- VANGUARD CENTERN01HD53414 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI CULHANE, JENNIFER F · 2007 to 2009
$11.1M
Modulation of PAH ovarian toxicity by biotransformation enzyme polymorphismsR21ES016846 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI LUDERER, ULRIKE · 2009 to 2010
$420k
NICHD NIH HHS N01HD53396NICHD NIH HHS N01HD53410NICHD NIH HHS N01HD53411NICHD NIH HHS N01HD53413NICHD NIH HHS N01HD53414NICHD NIH HHS N01HD53415NICHD NIH HHS N01HD63416NIEHS NIH HHS R21 ES016846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionDo the rates at which women transition among different intensities of pregnancy planning vary with age, marital status and race/ethnicity? SUMMARY ANSWER: Rates of transition from low or moderate pregnancy probability groups (PPGs) to higher PPGs vary by age, marital status and race/ethnicity. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The design of prospective studies of the effects of pre- and peri-conception exposures on fecundity, pregnancy and children's health is challenging because at any specific time only a small percentage of reproductive age women is attempting to conceive. To our knowledge, there has been no population-based, prospective study that repeatedly assessed pregnancy planning, which included women who were not already planning pregnancy at enrollment and whose ages spanned the female reproductive age range. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A longitudinal study was carried out that repeatedly assessed pregnancy probability in 12 916 women for up to 21 months from January 2009 to September 2010. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodWe analyzed data from the National Children's Study Vanguard Study, a pilot study for a large-scale epidemiological birth cohort study of children and their parents. During the Vanguard Study, investigators followed population-based samples of reproductive age women in each of seven geographically dispersed and diverse study locations over time to identify when they sought to become pregnant, providing a unique opportunity to prospectively assess changes in pregnancy planning in a large sample of US women. At study entry and each follow-up contact, which occurred at 1, 3 or 6 month intervals depending on PPG, a questionnaire was used to assess behavior dimensions of pregnancy planning to assign women to low, moderate, high non-tryer and high tryer PPGs. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: Crude rates of pregnancy increased with higher assigned PPG, validating the utility of the instrument. The initial PPG and probabilities of transitioning from low or moderate PPG to higher PPG or pregnancy varied with age, marital status and race/ethnicity. Women aged 25 to <35 years had shorter times to transition to higher PPGs or to pregnant compared with women <25 years. Women who were not currently married had longer times to transition from any initial PPG to pregnant, high tryer or high non-tryer status than currently married women. Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and Hispanic women had shorter time to transition from low or moderate to high non-tryer than non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. NHB women also had shorter time to transition from low to high tryer than NHW women. High tryers are more likely to be aged 25 to <30 years, to be married, and to be Hispanic, NHB or other race/ethnicity than women in the low PPG. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: Loss to follow-up varied by age, marital status and race/ethnicity. Although weights were not developed for the Vanguard study, the self-weighting design minimizes the bias of unweighted analysis. Nonetheless, the SEs for some estimates may be under-estimated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsOur results show that demographic characteristics are strong predictors of women's behaviors toward pregnancy. The results further show that frequent follow-up assessments of pregnancy planning behavior in large numbers of women are required to recruit an unbiased sample of preconception women. These findings will be useful to investigators designing prospective studies of fecundability, pregnancy outcomes and children's health. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS: National Institutes of Health (contracts N01-HD53414, N01-HD63416, N01-HD53410, N01-HD53415, N01-HD53396, N01-HD53413 and N01-HD-53411; grant R21 ES016846) and by the University of California Irvine Center for Occupational and Environmental Health. No competing interests. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: None.

Indexed as

Contraceptive Prevalence SurveysFamily Planning ServicesReproductive BehaviorAdultAsianBlack or African AmericanCohort StudiesFemaleHispanic or LatinoHumansLogistic ModelsLongitudinal StudiesMarital StatusPilot ProjectsPregnancyPregnancy Ratecompeting riskspregnancy behaviorpregnancy planningprobability of pregnancyprospective studyunplanned pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28398523
PMCPMC5437361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.