Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28398352›Full record

ArticleScientific data2017

X-ray computed tomography library of shark anatomy and lower jaw surface models.

Pepijn Kamminga, Paul W De Bruin, Jacob Geleijns, Martin D Brazeau

Abstract readDataset
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Was the Devonian placodermRoyal Society open science · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pepijn KammingaNaturalis Biodiversity Center Leiden, Darwinweg 2, Leiden 2333 CR, The Netherlands.
Paul W De BruinDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
Jacob GeleijnsDepartment of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Leiden 2300 RC, The Netherlands.
Martin D BrazeauDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Rd., Ascot SL5 7PY, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cranial diversity of sharks reflects disparate biomechanical adaptations to feeding. In order to be able to investigate and better understand the ecomorphology of extant shark feeding systems, we created a x-ray computed tomography (CT) library of shark cranial anatomy with three-dimensional (3D) lower jaw reconstructions. This is used to examine and quantify lower jaw disparity in extant shark species in a separate study. The library is divided in a dataset comprised of medical CT scans of 122 sharks (Selachimorpha, Chondrichthyes) representing 73 extant species, including digitized morphology of entire shark specimens. This CT dataset and additional data provided by other researchers was used to reconstruct a second dataset containing 3D models of the left lower jaw for 153 individuals representing 94 extant shark species. These datasets form an extensive anatomical record of shark skeletal anatomy, necessary for comparative morphological, biomechanical, ecological and phylogenetic studies.

Indexed as

Adaptation, BiologicalJawAnimalsBiological EvolutionFeeding BehaviorSharksTomography, X-Ray Computed

Identifiers

PMID28398352
PMCPMC5387928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.