Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28398192›Full record

ArticleSubstance abuse

An interventionist adherence scale for a specialized brief negotiation interview focused on treatment engagement for opioid use disorders.

Michael V Pantalon, James Dziura, Fang-Yong Li, Patricia H Owens, Patrick G O'Connor, Gail D'Onofrio

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Substance abuse. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Exploring Preferences in Emergency Department Coordination of Opioid Use Disorder Treatment by Race and Ethnicity.Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Michael V Pantalona Department of Emergency Medicine , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , Connecticut , USA.
James Dziuraa Department of Emergency Medicine , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , Connecticut , USA.
Fang-Yong Lib Yale University School of Public Health , New Haven , Connecticut , USA.
Patricia H Owensa Department of Emergency Medicine , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , Connecticut , USA.
Patrick G O'Connorc Department of Internal Medicine , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , Connecticut , USA.
Gail D'Onofrioa Department of Emergency Medicine , Yale University School of Medicine , New Haven , Connecticut , USA.
Yale University · US

Funding

Models of SBIRT for Opioid Dependent Patients in the Emergency DepartmentR01DA025991 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI D'ONOFRIO, GAIL, FIELLIN, DAVID · 2008 to 2012
$4.8M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA025991
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNo psychometrically validated instrument for evaluating the extent to which interventionists correctly implement brief interventions designed to motivate treatment engagement for opioid use disorders has been reported in the literature. The objective of this study was to develop and examine the psychometric properties of the Brief Negotiation Interview (BNI) Adherence Scale for Opioid Use Disorders (BAS-O).

methodsIn the context of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the efficacy of 3 models of emergency department care for opioid use disorders, the authors developed and subsequently examined the psychometric properties of the BAS-O, a 38-item scale that required raters to answer whether or not ("Yes" or "No") each of the critical actions of the BNI was correctly implemented by the research interventionist. BAS-O items pertained to the BNI's 4 steps: (1) Raise the Subject, (2) Provide Feedback, (3) Enhance Motivation, and (4) Negotiate and Advise. A total of 215 audio-recorded BNI and 88 control encounters were rated by 3 trained raters who were independent of the study team and blind to study hypotheses, treatment, and assignment.

resultsThe results indicated the BAS-O has fair to excellent psychometric properties, in terms of good internal consistency, excellent interrater reliability, discriminant validity, and construct validity, and fair predictive validity. A 13-item, 2-factor solution accounted for nearly 80% of the variance, where factor 1 addressed "Autonomy and Planning" (7 items) and factor 2 addressed "Motivation and Problems" (6 items). However, predictive validity was found for only one of the BAS-O factor items (i.e., Telling patients that treatment will address a range of issues related to their opioid use disorder).

conclusionsThis study suggests that the BAS-O is a psychometrically valid measure of adherence to the specialized BNI for motivating treatment engagement in patients with opioid use disorders, thus providing a brief (13-item), objective method of evaluating BNI skill performance.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeEmergency Service, HospitalHumansInterview, PsychologicalOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePsychometricsSurveys and QuestionnairesBrief interventionbuprenorphineemergency departmentinterventionist adherenceopioid use disorders, primary care, psychometricsscale construction and validationtreatment engagement

Identifiers

PMID28398192
PMCPMC7222694
OpenAlexW2590670781

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.